Waaaaa waaaaàa. Wheres the wambulance
You might not of noticed ...there was no counter point ..
Because I realised you were just too stupid
So I used my words sparingly
Ummmmm. No
The ummmmm is used to show someone is thinking ....and the No is used for showing someone ,that they were incorrect. And the silence after that shows that the person responding has decided to to waste his time taking to an idiot
It's Saturday today ...
Sent from my SC-01G using Tapatalk
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
I noticed, and pointed that out when you had your first go at replying to that post.
As for this:
You obviously wish to take the time to explain the obvious bits where you insult me, yet refuse to explain the bits you say I don't understand to enlighten me.
Let's face it, you're the one always hiding behind the veil of misunderstanding, incapable of conveying what should be simple, logical, points to back up such statements like:
I'll help you out a bit here so you can see what logic looks like. Your subsequent point about fiat money going to zero, ie, hard currency falling out of use; does not address the success described at all. Now if you had said persisted you would have made a decent point. This is what I mean about you hiding behind misunderstandings.
After that you didn't understand it when I clearly pointed out criteria for success is not persistence; this is when the hiding behind misunderstanding becomes deliberate. Then came the tanty, one to rival KMs in fact. Which of course I just gained amusement from.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Thank you for reposting my quote
Having re read it ...it looks perfectly understandable to me
Problem must be your end ....
And I still have all my toys in the cot ..but judging from your off thread activities
Your toys are all over the living room
Carry on ....
Sent from my SC-01G using Tapatalk
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
Why did you give the reduction in fiat money use as evidence that fiat economics has never succeeded? That is illogical; I understand you're confused about its implication and think that it somehow is evidence of that, but it remains illogical; and to simply keep reiterating it instead of addressing that counterpoint, makes you an uneducated moron who hides behind 'misunderstandings'.
As for my off thread activities? did I red-rep you for not conducting a logical discussion or something?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Why did you give the reduction in fiat money use as evidence that fiat economics has never succeeded? That is illogical;
Sooooo.... the reduction of the use , the tending towards zero ....of fiat money .....doesnt prove its success
and ya are calling me a moron
Classic ....pure gold that
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
All the fractured sentences, ellipsis, and ambiguity in statement makes your point difficult to glean from your post; I'm not even sure if you are summarising what I'm saying there or not (the lack of correct quoting format doesn't help ofc).
What I think you are saying is that the reduction in use doesn't prove a things success; this is obviously true, yet is not relevant to your point when you gave it as evidence it hadn't succeeded. Ie, it is illogical to assume because one attribute doesn't prove something's success, it has proven it's overall failure.
The success or failure of money is not determined by its longevity, but by its usefulness to society. You need to understand or at least address this point.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Well I could use a wall of words to say nowt
But I won't
Just give you. .... Weimar Zimbabwe. Venezuela ..Rome ..Babylon blah blah ...
All of those currencies were very useful to the people
as wall paper
Now I'll repeat ,....... All fiat currencies have gone to zero ...tended towards zero ( in usefulness and value )
Point addressed .
Sent from my SC-01G using Tapatalk
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
Since you again state 'all', the minority few which became worthless due to hyperinflation prove nothing.
Now, going towards zero in value is also irrelevant; due to inflation being a market mechanism to stimulate the economy.
So, you're left with going towards zero in usefulness as evidence of no fiat currency ever being successful. Again, you completely miss the point about what criteria constitutes success; so no, it is not yet point addressed. You just keep saying the same thing over and over again without understanding my first post to you on the topic.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
No .... Not shying away from anything
You lack the knowledge to have said discussion and I am not spoon feeding u.
If anyone needs an educational it is you
Come back to the table when you understand what money , currency and the history of fiat currency
Sent from my SC-01G using Tapatalk
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks