
Originally Posted by
Berries
Like any barrier then?
I sure as fuck do not want to slide in to an armco barrier or the posts that support it. I particularly don't want to hit it a glancing blow and come off my bike and then rag doll along the top of it losing chunks of my body on the top of the wooden posts. I don't want to hit a wire rope barrier and I don't want to hit concrete.
Totally agree. It's really a matter of degree. A safety measure that decreases safety pretty much defeats the purpose.

Originally Posted by
Berries
I don't want to hit a tree or an oncoming vehicle either. I don't want to drift off the road at 100km/h and hit a culvert, or go cross country and lose the front end and bounce in to a strainer post.
At least these haven't been put in for the express purpose of making the road safer.

Originally Posted by
Berries
All barriers can kill you if you try hard enough, armco, wire rope and concrete. They can also stop you being killed.
Agree on both points. The issue is whether we are safer with them than without. My own feeling (only opinion, no facts to back it up) is that we aren't.

Originally Posted by
Berries
There are no stats but I would have thought that barriers, of all types, have saved more riders lives than killed them.
This may well be true but it's no comfort passing Rangiriri on a dark, rainy night with a crawler in front and an massive truck approaching from behind trying hard to slow down and you have nowhere to go.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Bookmarks