Stupid World

**Brian d marge** · 16th July 2016, 00:02

What part of fuck off do you not understand.

sent for a divine source

**bogan** · 16th July 2016, 10:13

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

What part of fuck off do you not understand.

sent for a divine source

The bit where I have a choice. The bit where I believe it is those who refuse to make rational points are the ones who should fuck off. The bit where 'fucking off' would only leave you to continue perpetuating your ignorance and illogic.

**mashman** · 16th July 2016, 11:47

Originally Posted by bogan

The bit where I have a choice. The bit where I believe it is those who refuse to make rational points are the ones who should fuck off. The bit where 'fucking off' would only leave you to continue perpetuating your ignorance and illogic.

Nope. It's all your lack of understanding. His points are rational and logical under further investigation. That you are incapable of grasping the point Stephen makes tickles me somewhat... and your insistence that he has the lack of understanding is rather delicious too. But by all means, continue to blame others for your lack of understanding... it is your preferred modus operandi for coping.

**mashman** · 16th July 2016, 12:00

Turkish military launches coup

**bogan** · 16th July 2016, 12:39

Originally Posted by mashman

Nope. It's all your lack of understanding. His points are rational and logical under further investigation. That you are incapable of grasping the point Stephen makes tickles me somewhat... and your insistence that he has the lack of understanding is rather delicious too. But by all means, continue to blame others for your lack of understanding... it is your preferred modus operandi for coping.

Ah, the blind adherent chimes in. You lack the ability to differentiate between conclusion you want to believe (present) and rational point (missing) . Evidenced by your inability to make one yourself, and in this instance, further evidence by your inability to summarise his points (I've skipped a few posts here, feel free to bluster along while you catch up; or rationalise his points and prove me wrong), the ones you claim to understand.

**mashman** · 16th July 2016, 15:42

Originally Posted by bogan

Ah, the blind adherent chimes in. You lack the ability to differentiate between conclusion you want to believe (present) and rational point (missing) . Evidenced by your inability to make one yourself, and in this instance, further evidence by your inability to summarise his points (I've skipped a few posts here, feel free to bluster along while you catch up; or rationalise his points and prove me wrong), the ones you claim to understand.

Again with blaming your lack of understanding on someone else bwaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I can summarise Stephens posts, but you have demonstrated, repeatedly to the max, that you are incapable of understanding that which requires you to shift position and as such I'll not be bothering on this occasion. Thank you though, it's beautiful to see your ignorance in action whilst you vehemently deny that anything that anyone posts is valid because YOU can't understand it

**bogan** · 16th July 2016, 15:53

Originally Posted by mashman

I can summarise Stephens posts, but

Now there's a surprise. Do, or do not; that is what sums it up.

**mashman** · 16th July 2016, 17:13

Originally Posted by bogan

Now there's a surprise. Do, or do not; that is what sums it up.

bwaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. No, that isn't what sums it up at all. Thanks again

**bogan** · 16th July 2016, 17:19

Originally Posted by mashman

bwaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. No, that isn't what sums it up at all. Thanks again

Actually, it is a perfect summary; since it is an objective one. Your subjective waffel about how right you are is up to fuck all. It's why the stupid worlders and the conspiracy theorists fail time and time again; they don't understand how a rational mind works, so fail to effectively engage with them; leaving you shitters as the whinging minority you deserve to be.

**Scuba_Steve** · 16th July 2016, 17:57

Originally Posted by bogan

Actually, it is a perfect summary; since it is an objective one. Your subjective waffel about how right you are is up to fuck all. It's why the stupid worlders and the conspiracy theorists fail time and time again; they don't understand how a rational mind works, so fail to effectively engage with them; leaving you shitters as the whinging minority you deserve to be.

I need you to define "fail"; Stupid worlders currently run the world, and yes they're failing it as a whole but as an individual selfish goal most would call it success... So again gonna need 'fail' qualified here

**bogan** · 16th July 2016, 18:06

Originally Posted by Scuba_Steve

I need you to define "fail"; Stupid worlders currently run the world, and yes they're failing it as a whole but as an individual selfish goal most would call it success... So again gonna need 'fail' qualified here

How about I define stupid worlders instead, because they don't control the world, they're right at the other end of the spectrum whinging about those who do. A stupid worlder is one who deliberately misinterprets reality to see it in a negative light, often characterised by preaching how they know it could be run better yet being completely unable to justify such ideas. So when I say the stupid worlders are failing, what it means is terrible ideas like the money free party are failing to get traction. They remain in minority, the flavor of the month might change, but it's a minority nonetheless. In fact their stupidity often brings down genuinely decent and logical ideas simply by association.

**Scuba_Steve** · 16th July 2016, 18:14

Originally Posted by bogan

How about I define stupid worlders instead, because they don't control the world, they're right at the other end of the spectrum whinging about those who do. A stupid worlder is one who deliberately misinterprets reality to see it in a negative light, often characterised by preaching how they know it could be run better yet being completely unable to justify such ideas. So when I say the stupid worlders are failing, what it means is terrible ideas like the money free party are failing to get traction. They remain in minority, the flavor of the month might change, but it's a minority nonetheless. In fact their stupidity often brings down genuinely decent and logical ideas simply by association.

well I guess we definitely have different definitions of 'stupid worlders' cause these would be an example of what I'd call 'stupid worlder'

**bogan** · 16th July 2016, 18:25

Originally Posted by Scuba_Steve

well I guess we definitely have different definitions of 'stupid worlders' cause these would be an example of what I'd call 'stupid worlder'

Why? they're stupid obviously, but what part of the worlder term applies? Common usage of the 'word' worlder is to come from or reside in a world, ie, 3rd worlder. Both of those people come from and reside in the US, which is reasonably well educated.

I apply the term to morons who deliberately see the world as a negative place, a stupid world; since that is their mindset, it can be said that is where they reside and come from. The uninformed drivel, and unwillingness to enter rational discussion further validates that they are coming from, and residing in stupidity.