The American (USA) 2016 presidential elections thread?

[Brian d marge]

The ides of March are come.
Soothsayer: Ay, Caesar; but not gone.

Dearest Donald , history repeats......

[husaberg]

The ides of March are come.
Soothsayer: Ay, Caesar; but not gone.

Dearest Donald , history repeats......

I think you will find hes more of a cross between Caligula and Nero.

Caligula (12-41 AD), Roman Emperor, whose final words were "I am still alive !" he dies soon after, as a result of being stabbed by his own guards.

Nero couldn't even find a guard loyal enough to be willing to kill him.
His last words were, "Qualis artifex pereo." ("What an artist the world loses in me.")
Or "Too late! This is fidelity!" depending on the account

[Brian d marge]

I think you will find hes more of a cross between Caligula and Nero.

Caligula (12-41 AD), Roman Emperor, whose final words were "I am still alive !" he dies soon after, as a result of being stabbed by his own guards.

Nero couldn't even find a guard loyal enough to be willing to kill him.
His last words were, "Qualis artifex pereo." ("What an artist the world loses in me.")
Or "Too late! This is fidelity!" depending on the account

very good , I like that ...

I tried , but the computer told me I ....
must spread me cheeks ...

[husaberg]

very good , I like that ...

I tried , but the computer told me I ....
must spread me cheeks ...

Sounds like a virus.

[BuzzardNZ]

I think you will find hes more of a cross between Caligula and Nero.

Caligula (12-41 AD), Roman Emperor, whose final words were "I am still alive !" he dies soon after, as a result of being stabbed by his own guards.

Nero couldn't even find a guard loyal enough to be willing to kill him.
His last words were, "Qualis artifex pereo." ("What an artist the world loses in me.")
Or "Too late! This is fidelity!" depending on the account

Why am I not surprised you brought this up...


http://wikireedia.net/wikireedia/ind...al_Perversions

[Katman]

Why am I not surprised you brought this up...


http://wikireedia.net/wikireedia/ind...al_Perversions

I'm beginning to wonder if his surname is Podesta.

[husaberg]

Why am I not surprised you brought this up...


http://wikireedia.net/wikireedia/ind...al_Perversions

I guessing you missed the bottom of my signature, that’s normally a bit of a clue.
Then again you clearly don’t have many……..

[BuzzardNZ]

I guessing you missed the bottom of my signature, that’s normally a bit of a clue.
Then again you clearly don’t have many……..

No, I've seen your signature, see


http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...ds-(koi)/page9


Your signature makes perfect sense in an awfully hideous kinda way.

[husaberg]

No, I've seen your signature, see


http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...ds-(koi)/page9


Your signature makes perfect sense in an awfully hideous kinda way.

Cool, now humour me by showing me the post where i said i wanted to mouth fuck a 8 year old girl like your old mate Azkel.

It's obvious to most that you prefer boys under the age of 14 and clearly some even younger than that as you stated back in June
''i will fuck your children in the mouth'' 15th June 2016 19:44 Akzle

Even your online Bromantic liaisons stay clear of that comment.

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...post1131014019

[pritch]

Some here have seemed confused about what the Electoral College in the US is. Larry Lessig, Professor of Law at the Harvard Law School has written an article in the Washington Post. One of his areas of expertise is copyright, particularly as it applies in the age of the Internet, and he had been working with Aaron Schwartz. He also made a submission to the NZ court in the Kim Dot Com et al extradition case.

In this instance though his topic is the Electoral College and its function. The article explains why it's there and how he thinks it should operate. I found his conclusion somewhat startling, I hope he's not holding his breath.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.c5b8690ca49a

[yokel]

Some here have seemed confused about what the Electoral College in the US is. Larry Lessig, Professor of Law at the Harvard, Law School has written an article in the Washington Post. One of his areas of expertise is copyright, particularly as it applies in the age of the Internet, and he had been working with Aaron Schwartz. He also made a submission to the NZ court in the Kim Dot Com et al extradition case.

In this instance though his topic is the Electoral College and its function. The article explains why it's there and how he thinks it should operate. I found his conclusion somewhat startling, I hope he's not holding his breath.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.c5b8690ca49a

Ha, what a load of wishful thinking garbage.
They don't campaign to get the "popular vote" so the popular vote is irrelevant.
The reason Hillary did well in the popular vote comes down to being inflated be the blatantly biased media.

Trump won in a landslide slide, the dishonest media seems to miss this fact.

[yokel]

Another case of involuntary suicide connected to the Clintons

[Grumph]

Perhaps this is why Yokel is such a fanboi....

[Banditbandit]

Ha, what a load of wishful thinking garbage.
They don't campaign to get the "popular vote" so the popular vote is irrelevant.
The reason Hillary did well in the popular vote comes down to being inflated be the blatantly biased media.

Trump won in a landslide slide, the dishonest media seems to miss this fact.

When Hillary won the popular vote how can you say Trump won by a landslide?

[pritch]

Trump's people have already claimed they have a mandate. For the benefit of the hard of thinking, if there are more votes cast against you than for you, you don't have a landslide nor do you have a mandate.