The American (USA) 2016 presidential elections thread?

[pritch]

Drunk in charge of a country
.. officer....Can I still keep me licence?

No. That didn't work. He called a snap election while pissed and then lost it. Way to go Piggy.

[Brian d marge]

No. That didn't work. He called a snap election while pissed and then lost it. Way to go Piggy.

A least he didnt have fisher price , my little red button

sent for a divine source

[husaberg]

No. That didn't work. He called a snap election while pissed and then lost it. Way to go Piggy.

Pretty sure Squeaky Bill Rowling received plenty of public slaggings from Piggy Muldoon.

[Katman]

If you're wanting to talk foreign influence in other countries governmental process........

http://wearechange.org/top-10-times-...n-governments/

[PrincessBandit]

How many occasions has it been stated on alluded to that you are a P dealer.
Not once have you ever proved it to be untrue, to anywhere near the Katman level of case closed, there for you must be a P dealer then, if we apply your epic Katman logic

P as in pissing off or pissing on - that's more his style. He must have really gotten under your skin if you have to keep resorting to this.

[husaberg]

P as in pissing off or pissing on - that's more his style. He must have really gotten under your skin if you have to keep resorting to this.

Resorting to what? Meh, I was clearly only applying your brothers very own troll logic there.
As for your brother getting under someones skin, So do you believe he is some sort of parasites as well?

[oldrider]

The real reason behind all this American presidential electoral charade 9/11 and the world war on terror international demonisation of Syria Iran Russia etc etc!

Well here it is again! (in case you missed it the last time round) You are actually living in the real version of the world portrayed in this video think about that!

[yokel]

No that's not what I said, or what the article said. You pulled that out of your arse or wherever you got those clips from.
Against my better judgement I watched the first clip. The guy who made that has severely limited comprehension skills, the clip doesn't come close to making sense.

Happy New Year

WTF? Well that says a lot about your "better judgment"

[Katman]

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/...lites-want-him

[bogan]

I don't know one way or the other.

But the fact that you seem so sure of yourself when you actually wouldn't have a fucking clue is hilarious.

There's this little thing called burden of proof.

[husaberg]

That relies on someone being reasonable rather than suffering from conspiracy paranoia.
This means that the proposition being presented by the prosecution must be proven to the extent that there could be no "reasonable doubt" in the mind of a "reasonable person" that the defendant is guilty. There can still be a doubt, but only to the extent that it would not affect a reasonable person's belief regarding whether or not the defendant is guilty.

[Katman]

There's this little thing called burden of proof.

Have you familiarised yourself with the claims that the people who suggest the birth certificate has been forged are making?

If not, don't talk to me about burden of proof.

[pritch]

With Trump getting closer to the button by the day I expect we should look on the bright side, find the humour where we can. I see today that he claims he knows a lot about hacking. Yeah right!

The self-proclaimed hacking expert says that no computer is safe and that it's better to write the message on paper and send it by courier.
Apparently he doesn't know that it was an intercepted courier that lead the SEALS to Bin Laden.

[bogan]

Have you familiarised yourself with the claims that the people who suggest the birth certificate has been forged are making?

If not, don't talk to me about burden of proof.

Yes, and there is no proof to them; may as well hound Trump to prove the same thing. This is probably the bit where you eschew the whole burden of proof notion, and instead try to burden me with proving another one of your absurd conspiracy theories.

[Katman]

Yes, and there is no proof to them; may as well hound Trump to prove the same thing. This is probably the bit where you eschew the whole burden of proof notion, and instead try to burden me with proving another one of your absurd conspiracy theories.

I'm not trying to burden you with anything.

I'm just pointing out the absurdity of you proclaiming yourself so certain about something you know jack-shit about.