Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[Katman]

To be fair, most of the discrediting was due to the Methodology....

Face it dude, it's akin to you trying to tell me how to put a rear wheel back in a bike and me trying to tell you how to be a computer nerd.

[Woodman]

Face it dude, it's akin to you trying to tell me how to put a rear wheel back in a bike and me trying to tell you how to be a computer nerd.

Face it, you posted up a link from an obvious misinformation website and when challenged on that you have spent the last few pages trying to dig your way out of the hole you created.

[TheDemonLord]

Face it dude, it's akin to you trying to tell me how to put a rear wheel back in a bike and me trying to tell you how to be a computer nerd.

The great thing about that Analogy is - that assume you told me how to do something related to IT that was correct, it would still be correct...

Which kinda invalidates your entire argument...

And then we are left with why you consistently choose to post rehashed propaganda, as opposed to the actual study.

[Katman]

Face it, you posted up a link from an obvious misinformation website and when challenged on that you have spent the last few pages trying to dig your way out of the hole you created.

Face it, the mere fact that you don't agree with what the article says, doesn't make it "an obvious misinformation website".

[TheDemonLord]

Face it, the mere fact that you don't agree with what the article says, doesn't make it "an obvious misinformation website".

Is that like when you don't agree with someone, they are obviously a Big Pharma Shill? Or a Zionist/Israeli Shill? Or a Government Shill?

[Woodman]

Face it, the mere fact that you don't agree with what the article says, doesn't make it "an obvious misinformation website".

Bollocks. Who said I don't agree with it? I haven't expressed my opinion at all. My only interest is the source of the information and in this case the source you quoted is very biased, probarbly written by someone who gets their income from gullible folk like yourself.

[Katman]

Bollocks. Who said I don't agree with it? I haven't expressed my opinion at all. My only interest is the source of the information and in this case the source you quoted is very biased, probarbly written by someone who gets their income from gullible folk like yourself.

Like I said, the article was simply someone's opinion on the study.

If you disagree with their opinion, that's entirely your right.

[bogan]

Like I said, the article was simply someone's opinion on the study.

If you disagree with their opinion, that's entirely your right.

Just as it is his right to point out the errors, and attempt to enlighten the foolish people who so often get taken in by such fake news, alternate facts, and echo chambers.

Arguably, the only ones taking liberties with rights, are those attempting to perpetuate falsehoods. In this case the shit has flown downhill from those who wrote the study, then those who wrote the article, then yourself who got taken in by it. Is it additive on the way down do you think?

[Katman]

.... fake news.....

Yep, there's that echo chamber again.

[rc_36_rider]

Watch Vaxxed............................................ ..............

[Katman]

Watch Vaxxed............................................ ..............

Asking bogan to watch anything that doesn't fit his agenda is like pushing shit uphill.

[Woodman]

Watch Vaxxed............................................ ..............

Asking Katman to watch anything that doesn't suit his agenda is like pushing shit uphill.

[bogan]

Asking bogan to watch anything that doesn't fit his agenda is like pushing shit uphill.

Open minded scientific analysis is my actual 'agenda', so of course asking me to watch such factless, baseless, unscientific drivel is a waste of time. Such a suggestion lies in opposition to rational discourse, so of course you sit at the bottom of the hill under a mountain of shit and think everything is oh so difficult...

[Katman]

Open minded scientific analysis is my actual 'agenda', so of course asking me to watch such factless, baseless, unscientific drivel is a waste of time.

Remember that time you posted the video about 'Can we trust science?' for me to watch and it became apparent that you hadn't even watched it yourself because the gist of the video was that science isn't as trustworthy as many would like to believe?

Oh how I loled at your sheer stupidity.

[Woodman]

Remember that time you posted the video about 'Can we trust science?' for me to watch and it became apparent that you hadn't even watched it yourself because the gist of the video was that science isn't as trustworthy as many would like to believe?

Oh how I loled at your sheer stupidity.

There was probarbly a link of some sort to the actual information that he wanted you to watch.