Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Speeding drivers could be fined nearly double their weekly income.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048

    Speeding drivers could be fined nearly double their weekly income.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ome-penalties/


    Of interest is the bike-mounted taxation camera.
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    14th July 2006 - 21:39
    Bike
    2015, Ducati Streetfighter
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,081
    Blog Entries
    8
    Meh Poms ....... nuff said really.


    They get to go 160 on their motorways. I'd be happy with the open road limit at 160 and bigger fines.


    Poms .....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    3rd October 2006 - 21:21
    Bike
    Breaking rocks
    Location
    in the hot sun
    Posts
    4,381
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by AllanB View Post
    Meh Poms ....... nuff said really.


    They get to go 160 on their motorways. I'd be happy with the open road limit at 160 and bigger fines.


    Poms .....
    When did that happen? Was 70 mph tops on all the motorways I went on when I lived there.
    Only a Rat can win a Rat Race!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    7th December 2007 - 12:09
    Bike
    Valkyrie 1500 ,HD softail, BMW r1150r
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    2,144
    I believe it's Switzerland that fines percentage of income ?
    Opinions are like arseholes: Everybody has got one, but that doesn't mean you got to air it in public all the time....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    2nd December 2009 - 13:51
    Bike
    A brmm, brmm one
    Location
    Upper-Upper Hutt
    Posts
    2,153
    Aside from the fact this is a money making scam & nothing more, they're trying to move it severly into the territory of the punishment far exceeding the offence.
    One of the reasons the speed scam works is that it costs more to fight it then just to be extorted & move on, if they make it too expensive to be extorted I would expect to see backlash
    Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance
    "Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk

  6. #6
    Join Date
    21st May 2010 - 09:18
    Bike
    1998 CBR 900RR
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    334
    Part of the reason that open road speeding fines really irritate me, is that if governments REALLY believed speeding kills, and they REALLY want to preserve the lives of their citizens and not just raise funds, would they not enact a law that all vehicles must be speed governed? Surely that would not be very hard to bring in over a few years?

    Not that I am in favour of that! It just exposes the revenue agenda a little more and plays down the we must preserve lives view.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    6th May 2012 - 10:41
    Bike
    invisibike
    Location
    pulling a sick mono
    Posts
    6,054
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Dogboy900 View Post
    Part of the reason that open road speeding fines really irritate me, is that if governments REALLY believed speeding kills, and they REALLY want to preserve the lives of their citizens and not just raise funds, would they not enact a law that all vehicles must be speed governed? Surely that would not be very hard to bring in over a few years?

    Not that I am in favour of that! It just exposes the revenue agenda a little more and plays down the we must preserve lives view.
    and lest of course you forget also: that >80% of fatal crashes occur below the posted speed limit.
    so ovbiously, statistically, we need to reduce "speed limits" by 80% too.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    24th July 2006 - 11:53
    Bike
    KTM 1290 SAR
    Location
    Wgtn
    Posts
    5,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ome-penalties/


    Of interest is the bike-mounted taxation camera.
    To be honest I was more interested in the sheer density of doublespeak, almost every paragraph contained self contradictory statements or just pure old fashioned obvious bullshit.

    Alt-facts have hit Blighty with a vengeance eh?
    Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon

  9. #9
    Join Date
    13th April 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    Enfield cr250r
    Location
    Tokyo
    Posts
    3,430
    Blog Entries
    4
    Fk they must be well short of money , they will be registering mobility scooter next

    Sent from my SC-01G using Tapatalk
    "Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    9th May 2008 - 21:23
    Bike
    A
    Location
    B
    Posts
    2,547
    Must be a follow up to the Brexit master plan. Thought up by the same genius...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    25th June 2012 - 11:56
    Bike
    Daelim VL250 Daystar
    Location
    Pyongyang
    Posts
    2,672
    Quote Originally Posted by Dogboy900 View Post
    Part of the reason that open road speeding fines really irritate me, is that if governments REALLY believed speeding kills, and they REALLY want to preserve the lives of their citizens and not just raise funds, would they not enact a law that all vehicles must be speed governed? Surely that would not be very hard to bring in over a few years?

    Not that I am in favour of that! It just exposes the revenue agenda a little more and plays down the we must preserve lives view.
    Kinda mostly agree with all that but.... Having driven HGV in UK where ALL trucks (except foriegn and Irish) are limited to 56mph I've seen it actually create more dangerous situations and other problems. On cars it would be even worse.
    The problem being there will always be slight differences in speed due to tyre wear etc, this results in someone level pegging you for about 7 miles to overtake, you end up reluctant to brake or button off for danger ahead so you dont lose your precious speed.
    People do dangerous last minute braking overtakes into double lane roundabouts as thats the only other factor you;'ve got to sdqueeze distance on someone.
    Back to fines though, its NOT revenue gathering. Its a net loss as far a officers with patrol cars if you look at overall costs (police trainign and wages/car running costs, police base costs/court costs/non payment of fines). Cameras prob pay for themselves many times over but even then its an insignificant amount of money in terms of overall govt tax and spending.
    I mean come on, how often does the average person pay a speeding fine. I have plenty of 'fun' on the roads over the years and in over 20 years driving i've had one camera and two patrol car fines, well under a thousand dollars. Now how much have i paid in rego and income tax over those same years???? huge difference.
    Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer

  12. #12
    Join Date
    21st May 2010 - 09:18
    Bike
    1998 CBR 900RR
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    334
    All good points there R650R. I hadn't thought about the overtaking factor. Kind of makes it like a moto 3 race!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    13th April 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    Enfield cr250r
    Location
    Tokyo
    Posts
    3,430
    Blog Entries
    4
    Oh yes it's because we are bad people , we should be fined , it's for the good of the community

    Sent from my SC-01G using Tapatalk
    "Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."

  14. #14
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,269
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by awayatc View Post
    I believe it's Switzerland that fines percentage of income ?
    That sounds like a fine idea. (No pun intended.)

    The most unjust case that springs to mind was Carl, a Harley rider, he was hit and killed by a woman who had crossed double yellow lines to be on his side of the road. In court the Judge decided Carl had contributed to the accident by riding in the outer of his two lanes instead of the inner lane. Of course Carl didn't have a good word to say for himself. Accordingly the Judge fined the woman $1000. As it happened the woman was a doctor, and if she was married to another professional as would be common, that $1000 was the wettest of wet bus tickets.
    There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop

  15. #15
    Join Date
    13th July 2011 - 14:47
    Bike
    A Japper
    Location
    In the moment
    Posts
    1,259
    Quote Originally Posted by R650R View Post
    Back to fines though, its NOT revenue gathering. Its a net loss as far a officers with patrol cars if you look at overall costs (police trainign and wages/car running costs, police base costs/court costs/non payment of fines). Cameras prob pay for themselves many times over but even then its an insignificant amount of money in terms of overall govt tax and spending.
    I mean come on, how often does the average person pay a speeding fine. I have plenty of 'fun' on the roads over the years and in over 20 years driving i've had one camera and two patrol car fines, well under a thousand dollars. Now how much have i paid in rego and income tax over those same years???? huge difference.

    Twenty speed cameras earned $25 million in 2015, good earners those things.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •