Ironic if Puig gets rid of Pedro because when the latter arrived at Repsol Puig sold Honda on the story that Pedro could walk on water. Later they built the bike around Pedro at the expense of their then reigning world champ Hayden. It was all quite ugly.
Puig has long sold himself as a talent spotter. He used to have four young riders, with a block of four numbers, under his wing:24 Elias, 26 Pedrosa, and 27 Stoner . Dunno who 25 was. Anybody?
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
True but then Doohan would have had three more titles at least if he hadn't have crashed at Assen.
Plus Rainey wouldn't have crashed if he hadn't have had to push it beyond the limits if Yamaha had have built him a competitive bike either.
Kevin would have won more titles if he hadn't have rode around the Suzukis problems and if he had have been able to settle for 2nd or third place rather than risk a crash and DNF just like Eddie did.
Fact is despite having the best bike most of the time Dani was riding beyond is level of his skill too often when he crashed and thus he has no open titles.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Going on that logic, if Simomcelli hadn't taken Pedrosa out in 2011?
If Barbera hadn't taken him out in 2012?
If MM hadn't clipped him in 2013 cutting that sensor?
If they kept the soft carcus tyre last year?
Or this year:
If he didn't get a fucked tyre at Qatar
If Zarco hadn't taken him out in Argentina? We could have seen a totally different Pedrosa at COTA and Jerez (not that he was slow just not as dominant as last year). Now he's 50 points down through arguably no fault of his owm while he's been showing pace to rival MM at every track.
Takes both skill and luck to win a championship, especially in the current grid of aliens.
We all see what we want to see I guess, I see a rider with guts and mad skills fighting an uphill battle due to his size, but doing a good job despite it.
Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk
I wasn't being logical I was being sarcastic
IMO It takes far more skill than luck and far more hard work than talent to win.
But hard working talented people tend to be "lucky" when it comes to wining world Championships.
Jerry Burgess philosophy was to work harder to build a bike that was capable of wining so the rider could complete a whole race and championship by not having to risk riding at 100% and end up hurt himself.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Good rider... yes they all are.
His size was a massive advantage on 125's and 250's.
On the big bikes he could holeshot like a motherfucker and lack of weight shud give him an advantage on the picks (surely a must now that electronics control everything else) .Yet he's been outclassed by all his team mates on the most successful bike in the four stroke era.
On any other bike he'd be an also ran.
But Cal already has a ride.
Ah. You don't know what you're fucken blithering about.
Most of us can't really ride a bike for shit. I mean really control the thing. Those cunts however, can. At the same time as making changes to several other things on the fly.
Tell me how that is easier or less of a challenge.
Fucken dinosaurs whinging that it's less pure or not real bike racing, simply need to shut the fuck up. We live in an electronic age, and bikes are catching up.
Or should we all be riding foot clutch operated, exposed valve gear antiques?
Cocks.
Sparked up some good debate here
Damnit why didn't you hold up the sarcasm board.
Skill/talent - Pretty much all riders on the grid have shown they deserve their rides excluding a couple. MM has some massive reflexes on the bike which the other riders don't have, Other riders bring different skills than him that they use equally well. Rossi brings Sunday mojo and great racecraft, Zarco/Lorenzo smooth AF riding, Dovi mad breaking skills and analytical mind...
Hard work - Iannone would be a good case of someone who apparently doesn't work hard enough but has the talent to do well
Luck - MM chose the wrong tyre for a race, burned it out early then HAD to swap for slicks then killed the opposition. MM's 2 main contenders just got taken out of contention in one race. 2014 the only bike on the grid capable of beating him was being ridden by a guy in agony with arm pump.
Takes luck as well
As for the Honda being the best bike on the grid, if it was why do the rookies struggle so much on it?
It's had its up years (2014) and it's down years (2015) just like any bike.
I would agree that this year it's looking like being the best bike as it's not struggling with exit drive like it used to, but only if you can ride it like a nutcase. CC's isn't the best bike on the grid though remember it's a bag of shit so he has to push hard and crash out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks