Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[Katman]

You're now in a predicament - either you have to retract your statement about the good Mary Holland and her careful wording or you have to concede that your article was full of shit (like I said it was, after a quick skim read).

Don't be ridiculous. I don't have to do either.

Give your autism a rest and stop sounding like such a petulant child.

[husaberg]

Let's see if TDL has a cry about your lack of citations.

Unlikely because he can clearly see the embedded link I attached you however are not that smart.
Isn't it about time you showed us these facts that prove that its wasn't a myth that Andrew wakefeild is a not a total fraud.
Because everything you posted thus far just further points to the inevitable conclusion that he is a fraud

[TheDemonLord]

Don't be ridiculous. I don't have to do either.

Well this is you we are talking about, so it's to be expected that you are logically inconsistent and a massive Hypocrite.

The point of the exercise was to demonstrate it.

Give your autism a rest and stop sounding like such a petulant child.

Says the person accusing others of Autism....

[Katman]

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2683952

The next step should probably be to investigate the possibility of an association between vaccinations and allergies, and guess what......

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-acc...31-1000137.pdf

[jasonu]

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2683952

The next step should probably be to investigate the possibility of an association between vaccinations and allergies, and guess what......

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-acc...31-1000137.pdf

You make retards look smart.

[Katman]

You make retards look smart.

Did you struggle with the big words in those studies?

[jasonu]

Did you struggle with the big words in those studies?

I didn't open your links.

[husaberg]

I didn't open your links.

I would not bother to either, one is a non peer reviewed piece from a website that only requires payment to post anything.
The other is a junk science study that doesn't include the easily explained genuine statistical analysis to put it into context. To put the two together relies on the non peer reviewed piece being plausible and for someone to exclude common sense from the other unrelated paper.
Its just Katmans ilk continuing to go about grasping at straws.
Its well known that vaccines can cause allergic reactions, but they are in people that already have an allergy.
Attempting to go about Using that data to attempt to prove that the vaccination is the cause of the allergy is non logical even for a antivaxer loony.

here is a quote From

vinu arumugham December 23, 2016
Repeated bee stings cause bee sting allergy.
Repeated milk containing vaccinations cause milk allergy.

Anyone interested in a giggle at vinu arumugham should read this.
https://webcache.googleusercontent.c...&ct=clnk&gl=nz

[Woodman]

I didn't open your links.

Why would you?

[jasonu]

Why would anyone?

Fixed it for you.

[Katman]

Why would you?

So you could comment from an informed position - rather than just aimlessly flapping your gums.

[husaberg]

So you could comment from an informed position - rather than just aimlessly flapping your gums.

The informed opinion is 99.96% what you link is utter garbage.
#Margin or error .04%

[Woodman]

So you could comment from an informed position - rather than just aimlessly flapping your gums.

So then why didn't you / don't you post the opposing view to to yours show us that you just aren't soapboxing?

[Katman]

So then why didn't you / don't you post the opposing view to to yours show us that you just aren't soapboxing?

Perhaps you could post the opposing view to mine.

[Woodman]

Perhaps you could post the opposing view to mine.

I don't know what your view is because i didn't read the links.