Shotgun (single, double, pump, lever, bolt)
Shotgun Auto (non MSSA)
Rifle (single, double, pump, lever, bolt)
Rifle Auto (non MSSA)
MSSA
Pistol
Black powder (rifle, pistol, shotgun)
Air/Gas (pistol, rifle)
un-armed
You do realise the national party is backing the changes and they also ignored nearly all the recommended changes their own select committee put forward only a few years ago?
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/polit...-need-changing
The Select Committee’s terms of reference were to focus on how widespread firearms possession is amongst criminals – including gangs, how those people who don’t have a firearms licence come into possession of firearms and what changes, if any, would restrict the flow of firearms to criminals, gangs and people who don’t hold a licence.
“The committee made 20 recommendations. After careful consideration I’ve accepted seven, rejected 12, and recommended one proceed with changes,” Mrs Bennett says.
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/...mmittee-reportBennett rejected most recommendations from the select committee's near year-long inquiry. Five of the committee's nine members are National MPs, and it is chaired by National MP Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi.
The committee inquiry had caused concern among some gun owners and widespread changes would have been a controversial issue in election year.
Rejected recommendations include requiring police to record serial numbers of all firearms upon renewal of licence or inspection, requiring a licence to possess ammunition, and making dealers keep records of ammunition sales.
Bennett also declined to act on the recommendation to investigate the creation of a category of restricted semi-automatic rifle and shotgun.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/a...ectid=11876027
Its also hard to imagine its a dictatorship when we hold elections and the parties with the most seats decide what happens
Also i note Gerry Brownless has asked for the sale of semi autos to be stopped immediately.
Not only that. It took Australia 12 days to outlaw semi-automatic rifles and shotguns post the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, Where 35 people were slaughtered
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
so why did we have to wait until this happened and not follow aussie back then?
how many other kneejerk reactions are we going to get?
take that big billboard. seemed ok that it sat there for all that time with none of the three people including delicate kids having any sort of ear protection....
Surprising how many people on here have claimed to currently own pistols?
Only a Rat can win a Rat Race!
That won't stop it if you don't pay what they're worth.
Registration would have never have stopped this. That's delusional.
There are standard license semi automatics. Which is what's being bought.
Things like that will happen here. In Canada people registered hot glue guns.
All that coupled with lying biased media and a rush though with urgency mentality is seriously bad for the country.
Yes. If the government and by extension you. Are not willing to pay fair value then compliance will be low.
Because the aussie have had plenty of mass shootings after port Arthur. Rampant gun crime. Their system is a failure.
delusional is you answering to points i never made.
That example i used, i knew her we went to school together. Her 3 kids are going to grow up without a mother she was killed in front of them.
I am sure they would be real sympathetic to inconveniencing you over this issue.
Tell you what, pm me your address and i will send around her mum to explain to you what its like to lose a daughter to a murdering prick that had not only already raped her. Also one that had killed another person previously.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Really, it will no problem for you to point out where i said anything about buy back then, also . in the post you quoted.
Knowing where the guns are is not regisration it can be tracking with transponders it can be the police checking gun cabnets every year or randomly for security.
Or are you confusing me with the select committee National formed which strongly recommended registration or the Police association that also strongly recommended this and were both ignored.Yes but if you make sure the penalties for the grey gun receiving and selling is strong enough this shouldn't become an issue, No one wants to spend 10 years in prison for the sake of a few dollars.
Also if you know where the guns are, You end up with a better system then we have now. Plus it has to be user pays.
There will always be criminals. but in NZ they actually tend to use cheap weapons such as 22's or shotguns according to the stats.
three years and four months was not enough for illegally supplying the weapon used in a murder.
https://www.odt.co.nz/regions/west-c...sed-kill-woman.
How would anyone abuse the knowledge of registered firearms do they abuse the car registrations. or if you are mening your address
Shit really, i am expected to trust you with a military high velocity semi auto and you dont even want to trust me to know where you live? seems a bit one sided
The Government trusts me as a fit and proper person why cant you?
Do you deem guns to be a lower risk than Cattle as they have to be registered and their movements tracked this is a user pays scheme?
So how come you get to decide about the firearm rules anyway?
Do you know more than the firearm select committees or the police association?
You cant even reply to my posts in full. Or so a bit of courage to talk to the victims of firearms attack.
As for the funding, Under the NRA's right wing rules its a user pays world, it seems the tax payers have been funding the gun licences here though, so expect that to stop.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
[QUOTE=jafagsx250;1131128081
Because the aussie have had plenty of mass shootings after port Arthur. Rampant gun crime. Their system is a failure.[/QUOTE]
Really? the Wast Australian murder suicide (7 deaths) was the first mass shooting since port Arthur. Still plenty of crime involving guns, however
This (dated 2016)
1. Australia hasn't had a single mass shooting since the gun buyback.
The analysis, by Simon Chapman at the University of Sydney and colleagues, found that there were 13 mass shootings in the 17 years prior to the passage of the National Firearms Agreement. Since then, there hasn't been a single one.
Chapman and his colleagues define mass shooting as five or more victims shot and killed, not including the shooter. In the United States, there have been 11 mass shootings meeting that definition this year alone, and 33 since 2014.
Chapman, it's important to note, was active in the push for gun control in Australia following the 1996 massacre, and has written a book about the experience. Still, his paper is very cautiously worded -- at no point does he claim that the gun ban caused any of the observed changes.
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks