Stupid World

[husaberg]

I agree, wrong word, I know everything available to me or the general public, Fucken Tesla hide alot of shit from me

You mean like the cameras you claimed were not part of tesla vision....
How is it you got that wrong being a self styled tesla expert?
it seems almost impossible given you claim to be a tesla expert and have access to specialist information to get such a simple part so completely and utterly wrong

Teslas don't use cameras, they use a new technology in a micro chip called Dojo.
.

From tesla themselves
https://www.tesla.com/en_NZ/autopilot/3

Transitioning to Tesla Vision
We are continuing the transition to Tesla Vision, our camera-based Autopilot system. Model 3 and Model Y vehicles built from June 2022 for the New Zealand market now utilise our camera-based Tesla Vision, which relies on Tesla’s advanced suite of cameras and neural net processing to deliver Autopilot and related features.
Tesla's AI self-driving feature is made of neural networks which are trained on millions of video data so it can become better (remember the more data, the better the AI), and these millions of video data easily become big data and so using GPUs would be inefficient and distributed computing would be great but to train AI on data as big as millions of data videos which are updated daily you'd need a lot of computers as essentially distributed computing is just sharing processing work between a lot of computers and so tesla decided that building a supercomputer would be more efficient both tech-wise and cost-wise and so the Dojo supercomputer was born
The Dojo is a supercomputer built by tesla to train its AI deep neural networks and Machine Learning algorithms.
it goes smoothly the self-driving AI is taking note of its surroundings using an inbuilt camera and sending that video back to Tesla's servers so that data can be used to train it more and in so that way the more people who use the self-driving AI, the more it gets better.
Now back to the Dojo, in theory, when the video data gotten from the car is sent back to Tesla's servers, the Dojo supercomputer then gets hold of that data and uses it to train the neural network which powers the Tesla self-driving AI.

But Tesla is looking after it's young engineers to buy the stock at a lower price while the media make up shit

It's fucken frustrating as an o.g investor watching the share price tank while Tesla plays on it for there employees to get access to a cheaper share price
But I understand, these young engineers are fucken brilliant, and deserve a larger ownership of the company instead of greedy pricks like me wanting the share price to double as fast as possible.

sounds very communistic..
also at odds with what you said earlier about your massive growth of your shares worth.

[Al Bundy 4eva!]

^^Ummm, hey,hussebabe .. you the hot biker chick now? I'm not down or up to date with the young progressive left, what's your pronoun? She,her, sheezy?


..x

[Al Bundy 4eva!]

The look on this hot girls face envisions me trying to explain the complexities of the Tesla Dojo chip to the now hot girl Husenberg https://youtube.com/shorts/BHdVArwDaTY?feature=share

[pritch]

Saw a headline that Musk's Neuralink was under government investigation. No mention as to which of the many investigative arms of the government was involved.
This seems to be the story.

https://www.cnet.com/science/elon-mu...re-violations/

[TheDemonLord]

Saw a headline that Musk's Neuralink was under government investigation. No mention as to which of the many investigative arms of the government was involved.
This seems to be the story.

https://www.cnet.com/science/elon-mu...re-violations/

Tell me Pritch, do you not see the timing of this at all suspicious?

Musk releases internal Documentation showing that the Democrats were effectively breaking the First Amendment (In Spirit, if not in Law) and then suddenly one of Musk's companies gets investigated for Animal Abuse?

Animal Abuse being a particular crime that has no political Element or faction, the most lefty Raving Communist and the most individualist Right winger love Doggos and Cats.

Does this not ring a faint bell somewhere?

[Al Bundy 4eva!]

Tell me Pritch, do you not see the timing of this at all suspicious?

Musk releases internal Documentation showing that the Democrats were effectively breaking the First Amendment (In Spirit, if not in Law) and then suddenly one of Musk's companies gets investigated for Animal Abuse?

Animal Abuse being a particular crime that has no political Element or faction, the most lefty Raving Communist and the most individualist Right winger love Doggos and Cats.

Does this not ring a faint bell somewhere?

Great post !

Unfortunately many are still going to believe everything that state sponsored media print... even if they slightly bend the truth to suit the narrative.

Years of brain washing by state sponsored media is going to be a hard habit to kick for most.

[pete376403]

Great post !

Unfortunately many are still going to believe everything that state sponsored media print... even if they slightly bend the truth to suit the narrative.

Years of brain washing by state sponsored media is going to be a hard habit to kick for most.

Just as many are still going to believe everything that private media print (Rupert Murdoch, Alex Jones, et al...) even if they completely bend the truth to suit the narrative.

Years of brain washing by private media is going to be a hard habit to kick for some.

There is a saying "history is written by the winners" - wonder who the winners will be? Fortunately I am too old to care

[pritch]

Tell me Pritch, do you not see the timing of this at all suspicious?

Musk releases internal Documentation showing that the Democrats were effectively breaking the First Amendment (In Spirit, if not in Law) and then suddenly one of Musk's companies gets investigated for Animal Abuse?

Animal Abuse being a particular crime that has no political Element or faction, the most lefty Raving Communist and the most individualist Right winger love Doggos and Cats.

Does this not ring a faint bell somewhere?

Not at all. Musk's great Twitter tell all was a total bust. There was nothing there.

The RWNJs are banging on about the First Amendment but there was zero relevance in law or in spirit.
Twitter is not a government entity, neither was the Biden campaign. Revenge porn is illegal in most states, but all Biden was trying to do was keep his kid's dick pic off the Internet. What father wouldn't?

The Twitter staff communications revealed by Taibbi just show a concern for doing the right thing as opposed to any kind of cover up.

Musk sails close to the wind legally and financially. This investigation is unlikely to be the last.

[TheDemonLord]

Not at all. Musk's great Twitter tell all was a total bust. There was nothing there.

The RWNJs are banging on about the First Amendment but there was zero relevance in law or in spirit.

Okay, is Ro Khanna (Democratic Congressman and 'Total Biden Partisan') a RWNJ?

Because here is a direct quote from what was released:

But this seems a violation of First Amendment Principles

https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1...516929/photo/1

Twitter is not a government entity, neither was the Biden campaign.

Just so happens to be staffed by people that support 99% the Democrat party and give preferential treatment to the Democrat Party and as the emails show are willing to break their own policies in order to censor factual reporting that looks bad for the Democrats.

I mean... How much they couldn't be working closer together if their testicles were touching.

Not to mention we know the FBI told Twitter to be 'on guard' for certain information (I wonder what every could they mean?)

Revenge porn is illegal in most states, but all Biden was trying to do was keep his kid's dick pic off the Internet. What father wouldn't?

No one, until today, has raised the issue of Revenge Porn. No one. Don't try and create a post-hoc justification, the justification at the time was that it was 'hacked', except it wasn't. The internal Twitter communications show that they realised it wasn't a breach of their policies but they did it anyway because Orange Man Bad.

Even then, let's presume in good faith, that it's just about 'revenge porn' - fine, filter the explicit images, and allow the rest - as opposed to block everything.

The Twitter staff communications revealed by Taibbi just show a concern for doing the right thing as opposed to any kind of cover up.

Bull.
Shit.

They show a concern to stop Donald Trump from getting elected and taking active steps to interfere with that happened - and they even breached their own policies to do so.

[pritch]

Okay, is Ro Khanna (Democratic Congressman and 'Total Biden Partisan') a RWNJ?

I doubt it but there is zero relevance to the 1A.

Just so happens to be staffed by people that support 99% the Democrat party and give preferential treatment to the Democrat Party and as the emails show are willing to break their own policies in order to censor factual reporting that looks bad for the Democrats.

Total speculation on your part. As for the rest I guess you could think that if you consider dick pics as factual reporting. I don't.

No one, until today, has raised the issue of Revenge Porn.

Perhaps not in the strange parts of the Internet that you inhabit. It has been mentioned as the origin of some of the photos. I don't know when it was first mentioned but it wasn't "today".

[sugilite:Me]

Bull.
Shit.

They show a concern to stop Donald Trump from getting elected and taking active steps to interfere with that happened - and they even breached their own policies to do so.

Meh, Pritch is right, that so called huge twitter reveal was a damp squib. Protecting the public from seeing hunters dick is hardly preventing trump from being elected

[TheDemonLord]

I doubt it but there is zero relevance to the 1A.

A Congressman, against his own self-declared interests, says "this seems a violation of First Amendment Principles"

And you think it has zero relevance to the first Amendment.

What's Husa's line again?

"X thinks they know more about Subject than Y"?

Total speculation on your part.

Not at all, look up the declared (above $200) donations for Twitter by Party - it's never been lower then 97% in favour of the Democrats. Add in all the other sundry items, like having company T-Shirts that say 'Stay Woke'

As for the rest I guess you could think that if you consider dick pics as factual reporting. I don't.

Are you saying it wasn't Hunters Dick then?

I mean, I think I've tangentially mentioned it once or twice, however focusing on the Dick (heh. sorry, had to make the joke) is ignoring the balls is to ignore the more important parts - like taking money from the CCP and giving it to The Big Guy (strongly believed to be Joe) or the meetings that we know took place, appeared in Hunter's calendar, but were curiously missing from the VP of the US official schedule...

Perhaps not in the strange parts of the Internet that you inhabit. It has been mentioned as the origin of some of the photos. I don't know when it was first mentioned but it wasn't "today".

We have discussed Hunter's laptop since about 2020 - and yet this is the first time Revenge Porn has been raised.

I have 2 words: Red. Herring.

[TheDemonLord]

Meh, Pritch is right, that so called huge twitter reveal was a damp squib.

You're okay with the Government using politically aligned 'private' entities to censure political opponents?

Cool.

I'll make note of that for the future.

Protecting the public from seeing hunters dick is hardly preventing trump from being elected

If that was all they did, you might (and I stress, Might) have a point.

But they didn't.

And as to Pritch - Hunters Dick is the least offensive thing on the Laptop. The Drugs, Hookers, recorded criminal acts, Ladies of rather youthful appearance, Corruption, bribes etc. - that's the more interesting parts.

y'know - the things people said after the election that would have changed their mind on who they voted for if they had known about it. Like if one of the largest distribution platforms on the internet hadn't breached their own internal policies at the behest of the Democrat party to censor it because they hate Trump.

[pritch]

We have discussed Hunter's laptop since about 2020 - and yet this is the first time Revenge Porn has been raised.

It's far from the first time it has been raised online. I just did a quick search for Biden revenge porn. The oldest was from 2020, about when we started discussing Hunter's laptop. What a coincidence. There was a more recent flurry back in March resulting from a Joe Biden speech. Hardly yesterday.

Forty two states and DC now have revenge porn laws. These laws are recent and are evolving. Twitter allowing Hunter Biden's dick pic to be published without his permission would appear to breach most versions of the law.

A few examples to show which way the wind is blowing: Delaware where Joe Biden lives, DC where he works, California where Hunter Biden apparently lives and where Twitter has its HQ.

Delaware: Posting a nude or sexually explicit photo or video of someone on the internet without their consent.

DC: Knowingly disclosing one or more sexual images of another identifiable person when:
The person depicted did not consent to the disclosure of the sexual image;
There was an agreement or understanding between the person depicted and the person disclosing that the sexual image would not be disclosed; and
The person disclosed the sexual image with the intent to harm the person depicted or to receive financial gain.

California: [/I]Distributing the images, where the victim is identifiable; With the intent to cause serious emotional distress to the victim; and
The victim actually suffered such distress.[/I]

Any responsible Twitter employee would have paused before permitting unauthorised dick pics to be published on their platform.

[TheDemonLord]

It's far from the first time it has been raised online. I just did a quick search for Biden revenge porn. The oldest was from 2020, about when we started discussing Hunter's laptop. What a coincidence. There was a more recent flurry back in March resulting from a Joe Biden speech. Hardly yesterday.

Forty two states and DC now have revenge porn laws. These laws are recent and are evolving. Twitter allowing Hunter Biden's dick pic to be published without his permission would appear to breach most versions of the law.

A few examples to show which way the wind is blowing: Delaware where Joe Biden lives, DC where he works, California where Hunter Biden apparently lives and where Twitter has its HQ.

Delaware: Posting a nude or sexually explicit photo or video of someone on the internet without their consent.

DC: Knowingly disclosing one or more sexual images of another identifiable person when:
The person depicted did not consent to the disclosure of the sexual image;
There was an agreement or understanding between the person depicted and the person disclosing that the sexual image would not be disclosed; and
The person disclosed the sexual image with the intent to harm the person depicted or to receive financial gain.

California: [/I]Distributing the images, where the victim is identifiable; With the intent to cause serious emotional distress to the victim; and
The victim actually suffered such distress.[/I]

Any responsible Twitter employee would have paused before permitting unauthorised dick pics to be published on their platform.

Red.
Herring.

You've never mentioned it until now. Neither was it mentioned in any of the Twitter released emails. So it's a huge non-issue.

So stop trying to deflect from the truth that a partisan platform actively engaged in suppression of a true story, before an election, at the behest of the Democrat party, which had a significant impact on the result.

That's the bit that everyone's interested in.