This is why OSH is evil. It stops natural selection and keeps the dumb ones alive.
"Not one day that we are here on this earth has been promised to us, so make the most of every day as if it was your last, and every breath ,as if it were the same"
Well that stupid cunt of a hood rat had to expect a reaction, maybe the chef over-reacted (but it's one of those spur of the moment things, we've all been there), but still a reaction non-the-less.
-Indy
Hey, kids! Captain Hero here with Getting Laid Tip 213 - The Backrub Buddy!
Find a chick who’s just been dumped and comfort her by massaging her shoulders, and soon, she’ll be massaging your prostate.
Just a question for you all to ponder and an attempt at keeping an interesting discussion going (well to me it is anyway)
I have noticed in this thread a couple of mentions of the
Criminal Justice System
Is it called that because only the criminals can expect justice?
Stirring the pot.
"When you think of it,
Lifes a bowl of ....MERDE"
"People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule
Anything in its normal form is not a weapon, unless specifically designed as such. When he chose to use it as a weapon, it became one, just like your wrench would. The wrench is not a weapon, but use it as one, it becomes one.
He was hit with a big one... you don't normally worry about the minor stuff. Murderers don't get charged with weapon offences, what is the point?
I vote (b)....
[QUOTE=Mr Merde;1162561]They are extremely valuable and personal tools. Would you leave yours lying around work? I can't even leave my torch lying around or it goes "walkies."
These little shites were raising the ante throughout, and no doubt would have kept raising it, once they got off the bus to follow him perhaps? (Until he reacted and stopped it?).
Exactly... what about the ones who threw stuff and punched him???
How can these guys predict exactly how they would react? I couldn't, and I am classed as a veteran.
I'd like to know why the police havn't charged the little shits with assault at the very least. What about Public nuisance or disturbing the peace....there must be something they can charge them with. If they only do Mr Chef then that sends the clear message to the little shits that they can keep doing this kind of shit and the police WILL protect them. Next time they're in their little gang on the streets, I bet they do more than throw rubbish an punch someone in the face. It's what these lowlife little mongrel scumbags are taught from birth and now the law enforces it. These shits will think they're untouchable now.
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
Um... am I the only one here who has a problem with this post?
FWIW I agree with what Mr. Random has been saying. It's all too easy to kill someone with a knife if you don't know what you're doing. If you do, there are lots of ways to make superficial injuries that either slow them down or bleed so much they freak out.. but it can STILL go horribly wrong, and if your assailant is unarmed then you are going to jail.
The world is my oxter
I truly hope that the answer is "yes".
That's suicide from the tactical standpoint. You either absorb the attack and fall back or retaliate in full force in order to eliminate the threat. Limited response merely invites intensified attacks from the assailant.
Note that "assailant" is the key word here. The right to self-defense is one of the most basic human rights in my book. The assailant or as it happened in this specific case "assailant_S_" do not require to be armed to pose a lethal threat. As I mentioned earlier, a friend of my parents was beaten to death by a gang of unarmed teenagers in similar circumstances (sans the knife).
"People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule
One of the things I was taught is that if I was drawn into a fight at school, to only ever hit people with chairs in the arms and legs. It is all to easy to kill someone by punching them in the face/head. Thus why this man was justified in stabbing the little prick after getting a punch to the head, imho.
There has been more than one person in this country accidentally killed in a bar brawl (or whatever) by getting punched in the head... the brain does not like to bounce.
I admit it's hearsay, but potentially they as a group could've easily had him on the ground once they tailed him off the bus, and kicked him repeatedly in the head. If they do not wish to be stabbed, then they should not accost people on the bus who are merely going home from work... and for what? Because in their little hoody gang world wearing the wrong colour jacket is a good enough reason?
They should count themselves lucky that he merely defended himself and didn't psyche out and kill the lot of them, which by the way would have been doing this country a favour.
Nothing would please me more than to see hoody gang members covered in petrol and set on fire. Limb by limb.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks