Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 131

Thread: Car insurance compulsory?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    22nd December 2006 - 15:47
    Bike
    1990 FZR600
    Location
    HB/Christchurch
    Posts
    102

    Car insurance compulsory?

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/...ectid=10465761

    Good move I say, it says nowhere in the article if bikes are to be included though. Although it could just be the Herald forgetting that bikes actually exist.

    I don't think we should be included, without being hypocritical the stats are stacked against boy racers and we all know they are too scared to ride bikes Can't blame everyone for their idiocy.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Yeah but it going to fuck normal responsible kids as well as we all know how the insurance companies use statistics.

    Lowering the financial boom on any male under the age of 25 to drive.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,393
    If its bought in, it will cover all vehicles.... motorcycles are vehicles and thus it will be compulsory. But registration fees and ACC levies won't go down, and insurers (which in all cases are profit oriented businesses) will have a huge say (through leveraging premiums) as to who can and cant (maybe should or shouldnt) be on the road. Of course it will give the pleece another stick to beat any driver with (May I see your drivers licence, registration and insurance card please, sir/ma'am").

    On balance I think a positive thing potentially, but like all these measures, it is only us law abiding middle aged citizens who will pay: I can afford it, and I am seen as a good risk by insurers.

    Fuckwit boy racers (sorry "car enthusiasts") won't be affected: they know their POS shitboxes have no show of being covered, plus anyone with a bad driving record will be seen as a bad risk and premium loaded accordingly. These cock smokers dont pay their fines OR their rego OR their WOFs already, why would you think one more thing they wont pay will make a bit of difference?
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

  4. #4
    Join Date
    22nd December 2006 - 15:47
    Bike
    1990 FZR600
    Location
    HB/Christchurch
    Posts
    102
    Yeah but it going to fuck normal responsible kids as well as we all know how the insurance companies use statistics.

    Lowering the financial boom on any male under the age of 25 to drive.
    Why would the price of 3rd party insurance go up if it was made compulsory?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    22nd December 2006 - 15:47
    Bike
    1990 FZR600
    Location
    HB/Christchurch
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase View Post
    Fuckwit boy racers (sorry "car enthusiasts") won't be affected: they know their POS shitboxes have no show of being covered, plus anyone with a bad driving record will be seen as a bad risk and premium loaded accordingly. These cock smokers dont pay their fines OR their rego OR their WOFs already, why would you think one more thing they wont pay will make a bit of difference?
    Yea agreed that maybe we could bring in a law where you actually have to pay fines. Someone once had a good idea for the morons who have ~ 20k in fines.

    One night in jail = $200.

    Now pay the fines.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by caesius View Post
    Why would the price of 3rd party insurance go up if it was made compulsory?
    Look at other countries that have it... for some reason, insurance companies equate 'compulsory' with 'thou shalt go and rapeth all thy customers'. Wankers.

    Anybody that thinks compulsory insurance will make a worthy dent in the activities of boy racers needs their head read.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    10th August 2006 - 16:34
    Bike
    Bikeless @ Mo - Injured
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    Yeah but it going to fuck normal responsible kids as well as we all know how the insurance companies use statistics.

    Lowering the financial boom on any male under the age of 25 to drive.
    My car is registered in my mums name because of this...
    I have never had an accident in my 8years on the roads... but because I drive a 2L turbo subaru & im under 25 I fall into the 'risk/racer/whatever' category....

    The first year of having this particular car I had it in my name & insurance in my name, it was $2500/year to be covered... & excess was even more!!

    Now that it is in mums name with myself on the insurance policy as named driver etc... It only costs me $49/month (was $55 last year but no claims=lowered premiums) now.

    Its crazy... because I have a clean record (& licence) etc... but that doesnt seem to matter whatsoever... im still gonna go race n crash n write my car off into a porsche or something right?!

    EDIT: my excess is still around 2-3k or something but thats due to mags & modifications etc, so they added on a grand to excess when I phoned them to say I'd put the mags etc on it. wouldnt want to not tell them about mods n have something happen n not be covered for those bits.
    "World famous since ages ago"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    23rd November 2003 - 21:16
    Bike
    big red one, rgv's, kdx's
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    690
    The only winners in this will be those that have pushed to get this through- the insurance companies. Look at 3rd party insurance costs in most other places on the planet, fuck this, its bullshit.

    Its going to cost us all a bundle. fuck the insurance companies, they now have the license to print money that they have been pushing for for years.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    23rd September 2007 - 14:39
    Bike
    1998 ZXR 400
    Location
    Sakura
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by caesius View Post
    Why would the price of 3rd party insurance go up if it was made compulsory?
    Liken it to something you should have been through, NZ\'s stupid < 250cc laws, what a 250 prices like? Enough to buy far superior better handling bikes of greater cc\'s? SRAD 750\'s for 5k on average, cbr/zxr 250 for 6.5k+

    I POWER was what the government wanted to restrict thats what the laws should say! Ridding a NSR250 putting out 50 horse at the wheel is legal on day 1!!!

    To quote the article

    Quote Originally Posted by BULLSHIT View Post
    Compulsory third-party insurance is expected to improve road safety by making it more expensive for boy-racers to use high-powered cars.
    Quote Originally Posted by LOGIC View Post
    Automobile Association spokesman Mike Noone said he remained unconvinced that compulsory insurance would restrict access by young racers to vehicles without imposing an unnecessary burden on the rest of society..
    To liken it to motor bikes, lots of people ride unsuitable bikes on there learner and restriced whist nto breaking the law. I dont think compulsory third party insurance will stop any boy racer from driving dangerously and unskillfully on the roads. Infact, they already break the law anyway, those dangferous boy racers, scum of all criminals eh, why would they care about some insurance bizzo?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by caesius View Post
    Why would the price of 3rd party insurance go up if it was made compulsory?
    As it will.

    We can take the bet if you wish but as imdying alludes the cost of insurance will increase.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    It's all going to get very messy and complicated... what of those with a few old bikes that might get ridden once or twice a year? Do they all have to be 3rd part insured as well? If not, just how complicated is this system going to be? Complicated enough to charge plenty for it?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying View Post
    It's all going to get very messy and complicated... what of those with a few old bikes that might get ridden once or twice a year? Do they all have to be 3rd part insured as well? If not, just how complicated is this system going to be? Complicated enough to charge plenty for it?
    We have individual licenses. Why not individual insurance?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    17th March 2007 - 11:14
    Bike
    Gixxer Thou
    Location
    Auckland, North Shore
    Posts
    175
    Compulsory 3rd party insurance is a must, I believe. Your annual premium would depend on the power/value of vehicle, no claims bonus (which is earned), and your driving history (demerit points, bans, etc, raise premium). This would encourage people to keep their premiums lower. No insurance - no drive.

    Following on from this, the offence of driving without insurance would have to carry stiff penalties, a ban perhaps is in other countries.

    Currently, if I get hit up the arse by someone without insurance I have to cover the damage. How can that be fair?

    As far as "boy racers" go, I believe that the ability to get finance here is too easy. In NZ, with the flood of cheap "Jap turbos" and easy finance, any young kid can go get himself a fast car and that's not good.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    23rd September 2007 - 14:39
    Bike
    1998 ZXR 400
    Location
    Sakura
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying View Post
    It\\\'s all going to get very messy and complicated... what of those with a few old bikes that might get ridden once or twice a year? Do they all have to be 3rd part insured as well? If not, just how complicated is this system going to be? Complicated enough to charge plenty for it?
    If there registered they have to be insured. Pretty simple. If on exemption they won\\\'t. If any of you were in the insurance industry and you were given this gift of compulsory third party I think you\'d put prices up a wee bit to..

    Interestingly this will not only affect joe blogs but big businesses like mine where the fleet is over 80 cars, we dont bother insuring through an agent as prices would be phenomenal, and do it ourselves, as it works out cheaper. The NZ police and all Governement Health Boards will no doubt have more expenses to pay.

    FREEDOM OF CHOICE. TO INSURE??? HELENGRAD FOR ANOTHER TERM!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by Ewan Oozarmy View Post
    Currently, if I get hit up the arse by someone without insurance I have to cover the damage. How can that be fair?
    Surely your insurance covers it? And the excess you can get through small claims.



    I you are hit by an uninsured driver in the UK there is a magic fund that covers your losses....... paid for by those with insurance..... not quite sure how it works though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •