Seriously.... Why is everyone placing their own personal agendas on this issue... Frosty is a great guy - popular and he has many many fiends here. There are glowing testaments to his many good deeds which adds up to a pretty decent human being.... Thats great - hes lucky to have such caring friends. But - That might not qualify him as a fabulous moderator of this site... No one is 100% good or 100% bad... Clint Rickards has done some very good things and is highly regarded by some (not me) people (still) but he didn't follow the rules and he paid the price (well technically the tax payer paid)....
This is a mod thing. I'm just guessing but the team had a parting of the ways, Tony is upset and made it public..... Fair enough - his call but ultimately not a good one, perhaps that knock on the head has altered his judgement (Just kidding Tony) Why turn it into ww3? If Tony says lets fight - you need to decide if you want to support him but he is saying to cool it... So![]()
Well I think frosty was always to good to be a moderator of this site. Leave it to the dicks - Frosty. There's plenty of them here.
Maybe it's this type of behaviour that made SpankMe appoint mods in the first place? He doesn't want or need to deal with this type of bullshit.
Even if you did do said petition, who're you going to bitch at if Spank tells you where to stick it? This isn't a democracy so HTFU.
P.S. Bitch about this all you want. I won't see it because I'll be out riding![]()
I note the names of some of those posters who had posts moved...
We do want to know. It is obvious that no-one of us is comfortable with the lies and deceit which seem to surround this current issue.
As far as the 'permission' thing goes, I guess you are not about to give that for the PMs you sent ?? Which would still leave the situation one-sided and unresolved.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
It has already been suggested. Replace ALL mods. Not the junior ones, not the senior ones - ALL mods. The disease has spread.
Can't argue with that.
Hmm. Jump or be pushed. Yeah, right "a parting of the ways".
Right. Going off to spend the day riding.![]()
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
View my new blog at www.girlybikes.blogspot.com
Perfection is not something you should ever attain, but something to always strive for. For if we actually achieve our idea of perfection, is it then any longer perfect?
The bigger picture in all of this that no one has really mentioned is the fact that the kiwibiker trackdays are gone because of this.
Yes he did them off his own back, but they were primarily for kiwibiker members. How many of the members here can say they are better riders because of it! You only have to ask the 85 riders at the last one to see how much these events will be missed.
There are several behind the scenes elements that make it impossible for him to run them without being a moderator. Even I don't know half of what goes into one and I have helped out at the last 3.
There has been alot of talk about how he broke the rules constantly but that was according to one senior member and NOT the site owner.
Agreed! But, these rules should be fairly applied.
Are you sure about that? I always thought that there were 2 levels of Moderation on KB. Are you privy to emails/PM's from Smods that may or may not have been sent?
Somehow I doubt that it is the end of the story.
This is really not that difficult an issue.
When people voluntarily spend a lot of time on something it is usually a good indication that they value it. It may be "just the Internet" and "not as important as going for a ride", but still relatively valuable. Rep points and post counts and other such obviously silly measures serve to reinforce people's sense of attachment to a forum such as this, which increases the value it has for them. As a very wise former manager of mine once said, "People just want to belong". Looking at Frosty's original posting, he clearly feels aggrieved, and has lost something he values.
Bikers and a curious lot. On the one hand we have this rebel-without-a-cause, I-don't-need-anything-but-a-good-road independence, but on the other hand we're under siege (cagers trying to kill us, govt valuing our lives at zero, family and friends calling us temporary NZers, etc) so we kinda (maybe just a little bit) like being part of a community. We like group rides, getting together at a mates house to work on a mechanical problem, rallies... etc. And thus we form closer relationships than, say, model-aircraft collecting groups - so have a higher level of empathy when one of us is mistreated. (Have a look at Str8 Jackets post about nearly being mugged - there were people here offering vigilante justice within 30 mins!). So those of us who like and respect Frosty (which seems to be a well deservedly large number) share some of his feeling of being aggrieved.
Having mods is arguably a necessary evil for a large community - because some people are just tossers - but heavy-handed, inscrutable, generally unreasonable moderation (they call it moderation for a reason, remember) creates division, makes us feel like we don't belong, that there are another group we need to rally and defend against - and the worst thing is they are us, fellow bikers. Therefore attacks on mods are more vicious than they would be toward outsiders. The mods, therefore, have to do extra work to control this effect, and minimise the division between the mods and the proles, to make sure they aren't the enemy in the eyes of the 99% of reasonable people here.
If not? Well, there is a risk here, that has been pointed out by others, of the site becoming so divided by driving away valued and valuable contributors, that it crumbles to a shadow of it's former glory. What controls get put in place to avoid this are for SpankMe to determine, if he even wants to - he's the site god after all - but that doesn't mean he'll get it right, as far as the majority (or even a large minority) are concerned, which will lead to more defections. And more "brand dilution" for KB as alternative sites become more credible in the collective mindspace. It's happened before, over and over, shows, sites and groups "jumping the shark". Internet success is hard to do, and network effects are hard to predict, but the best outcome is generally achieved with the fewest, clearest and most reasonable rules. But that's a separate discussion.
The Frosty being fired issue is now in the public arena (sadly along with the whole bike sale dispute thread). Leaving it undiscussed and behind closed doors is indeed an option, but will just reinforce the issues above and reduce the value many people attach to KB. I wouldn't choose that path, if it were up to me.
(climbs off soapbox)
Last edited by rainman; 18th November 2007 at 10:02. Reason: fixed < formatting
Redefining slow since 2006...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks