Firing interval is what would determine if a square four behaved as a V4, two V twins or two parrallel twins or a perverted inline four.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
hmm "i disapprove..." I disapprove of your outlook on my wee little project, i disapprove of the idea i should just go out and buy a new sports bike and i disapprove of having to tally up the total cost of a build before its starts and spend not a cent more...
I also disapprove of being called an inadequate wanker, hence the red showing said disapproval.
Wouldn't a two stroke vtwin sharing the same crank pin make it essentially fire like a "big bang" engine? I mean, everytime the piston is at TDC, the spark plug fires and you get a power stroke. So, if two conrods shared the same pin, it would mean both pistons would fire at the same time as they would both be at TDC at the same time, effectively making an expensive single cylinder.
So Aprilia RS, Suzuki RGV and Honda NSR aren't true v-twins...
I suggest you take imdyings advice
V Engine
One with two banks of in-line cylinders mounted with an angular separation on a common crankcase.
Common crankcase, NOT common crankshaft.
Seems I'm not the only one suffering from a misconception of what constitutes a V configuration engine.
Also direct from the Cagiva website, specifications for the Cagiva C504, as ridden by John Kocinski - "498,3cm3 (56/50,6mm) 80°V4 twin crankshaft". Seems even the dudes designing and building the engines have got it wrong. Just for interest, the cranks in this square four(?) were geared together and contra-rotating.
No. Plus you can't(shouldn't) build a 2-stroke twin with the cylinders displaced about the crankshaft axis sharing a common crankcase as the cylinder port timings will be different by the value of the V angle. The 1st cylinder whose transfer ports open will get the best shot of air/fuel, leaving not much for the 2nd. You could get away with it if air was force-fed direct to the cylinder ports and not via the crankcase. Pretty typical setup for the BIG turbo diesel 2-strokes as in ships etc. They are in-line engines though.
I've toyed with the idea of supplying fuel/air/oil to a manifold over the transfer ports from a little supercharger I have, but time/ money etc will make sure it never happens.
Edit - I type too slow!
Nawt wrong wiv 'em I say. Was good enough for Uncle Sylvester and it's good enough for us.
http://www.motorcyclemuseum.org/classics/bike.asp?id=3
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Pixie, just wondering if this helps clear it up a bit for you?
BTW, if it doesn't, let me know because there is an engineer here in CHCH that designed and built a 500cc V4 dual crank ZXR250 based engine. Now this guy has only built and designed engines, and as you have owned lots of engines you no doubt can correct him as well.
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
Nope - two stroke diesels dont have to be in-line. You must have seen GM 6,8 or 12 cylinder two strokes in Vee configuration, eg 6V71 or 8V71.
And as for a naturally aspirated two stroke, whether inline or V, each cylinder has to have it's own crankcase - it might be a common casting but each chamber is sealed from it's neighbour(s)
The main reason for building a V twin over a parallel twin was to get more room in the cylinders for the transfer ports.
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks