Do females enhance bike pics?

**avgas** · 21st February 2008, 08:43

I'm all for bikes and chicks.
However all in moderation.
Bike in front of the chick.
Its like priorities.

**Headbanger** · 21st February 2008, 09:13

Im happy either way, a shit pic is a shit pic, a good pic is a good pic, They can load as much eye candy as they want into it, It either works or it doesn't. The clown at the end of the line should have an eye for what pics to use.

But I'm a sucker for a set of tits, real or not.

**Mikkel** · 21st February 2008, 10:02

U is doin it rong!

It's the other way around. The bike adds to the female...

If we're concerned with the bike the female is irrelevant.
If we're concerned with the hot looking female the bike is a bonus!

**breakaway** · 21st February 2008, 10:43

Originally Posted by FROSTY

If i wanted to go to a titty show I'd pay and go to a titty show.
I want to see bikes I dont want some model type draped over it.

All I do if I want a titty show is open E:/Downloads

**Katman** · 21st February 2008, 11:05

An example of when photos of women on bikes goes horribly wrong.

http://cold-snail.smugmug.com/photos/232295314-O.jpg

**BIHB@0610** · 21st February 2008, 12:02

To me bikes and hot chick models look wrong together - women have lovely soft lines, bikes tend to be pretty hard-looking, angular. The two together are incongruous - when it's for some marketing exercise. That's just based on my idea of aesthetics anyway - whatever makes you happy

How's this for an idea to get the blood pumping though - you and your significant other take a new bike for a test ride, stop off somewhere and shag, then return the bike? That way everyone gets to look at (and touch!) everything they like, but it's all in context.

Oooh I'm gonna start ringing round the dealers now ........

**sidecar bob** · 21st February 2008, 12:06

Originally Posted by Planna

To me bikes and hot chick models look wrong together - women have lovely soft lines, bikes tend to be pretty hard-looking, angular. The two together are incongruous - when it's for some marketing exercise. That's just based on my idea of aesthetics anyway - whatever makes you happy

How's this for an idea to get the blood pumping though - you and your significant other take a new bike for a test ride, stop off somewhere and shag, then return the bike? That way everyone gets to look at (and touch!) everything they like, but it's all in context.

Oooh I'm gonna start ringing round the dealers now ........

That is really wrong & shouldnt be done.
Hey can you phn BMW & see if they have a R1200GS for Saturday morning please babe?

**Hitcher** · 21st February 2008, 12:17

Festooning bikes with scantily-clad or completely naked bint is a most peculiar and anachronistic process that seems to be a residual part of biker culture. Surely most bikers are smart enough to know that the woman illustrated doesn't come with the bike? Presumably the assumption the publishers of such material make is that there is some onanistic rub-off or imprinting that is beneficial to the bike's manufacturers.

**HenryDorsetCase** · 21st February 2008, 12:32

Originally Posted by deanohit

I decide to use some examples here,
Pic 1 is an ugly bike, hence a good looking chick to distract the eye away and is a better picture for it.
Pic 2 is a sexy bike (some would say the sexiest) with a good looking chick (who also happens to be wearing a Ducati jacket.

) and ruins the lines of a beautiful bike in a cool setting.
Pic 3 is another awesome bike, but the chick fits in with the sexy, but aggressive theme of the bike and IMHO enhances the pic as she isn't blocking any of the bikes lines.

Uh, not so much. Plus the stupid pouty face thing. Also her samurai swords must dig into the seat/tailpiece a bit.

the only pic there that is not FAIL is the middle one.

but i am a grumpy old man. If I want to look at motorbikes I want to look at motorbikes, if I want to look at boobies, I want to look at boobies.

booooooooooobies!!! (might not be NSFW depending on your work.. it was sent to me by a workmate so there we go. Lindsay Lohan, not so hot.

what were we talking about?

**HenryDorsetCase** · 21st February 2008, 12:34

Originally Posted by Hitcher

Festooning bikes with scantily-clad or completely naked bint is a most peculiar and anachronistic process that seems to be a residual part of biker culture. Surely most bikers are smart enough to know that the woman illustrated doesn't come with the bike? Presumably the assumption the publishers of such material make is that there is some onanistic rub-off or imprinting that is beneficial to the bike's manufacturers.

I have been spoiled for life by the BSA and Norton ads from the early '70's.

**sugilite:Me** · 21st February 2008, 12:37

Originally Posted by katman

An example of when photos of women on bikes goes horribly wrong.

http://cold-snail.smugmug.com/photos/232295314-O.jpg

Your absolutely right, That photo of you on your bike, shown far right, has your name spelled incorrectly on the tank. Bummer

**Livvy** · 21st February 2008, 18:59

Originally Posted by deanohit

I decide to use some examples here,
Pic 1 is an ugly bike, hence a good looking chick to distract the eye away and is a better picture for it.
...

Saw some of the "bikes" in picture one in Greece while I was there, couldn't believe my eyes. Why? Why would you do that?

But come on, who doesn't find this guy from Paris sexy on his MP3?

Europeans made me laugh...

Wish I could find the photograph of some guy on a scooter with his wife (assuming) and two children on it with him. Four people on a 50cc scooter. All I can think is "

"

**Livvy** · 21st February 2008, 19:03

Originally Posted by Mikkel

U is doin it rong!

It's the other way around. The bike adds to the female...

If we're concerned with the bike the female is irrelevant.
If we're concerned with the hot looking female the bike is a bonus!

See, that makes sense.