Maybe if your mate returned the bike and obeyed the speed limit he'd still be alive and the owner of the bike would have it back in one peice. Pretty ideal situation that, yes? Everybody wins? I'm not detracting from your loss, just pointing out how your logic surrounding the circumstances is complete and utter bollocks.
Just because the bike is replaceable didn't give him any right whatsoever to ride it like he did. It's not anyone else's fault apart from his that he ended up paying the ultimate price.
Peace out.
Bookmarks