Boobs On Bikes

**imdying** · 20th August 2008, 13:01

Originally Posted by FJRider

Its called advertising... TEASERS...They'll be out of your price range...

Mate, I wouldn't even touch one of those whores with yours

I won't ask how you came to be an expert on what a whore charges though

**FJRider** · 20th August 2008, 13:16

Originally Posted by imdying

Mate, I wouldn't even touch one of those whores with yours

I won't ask how you came to be an expert on what a whore charges though

Which one's WILL you "touch" ??? I'm still learning... Have'nt got to the "pay" phase yet. What I am curious about is your total ease of recognition, of who IS or IS'NT a whore...

**yod** · 20th August 2008, 13:19

Originally Posted by imdying

Mate, I wouldn't even touch one of those whores with yours

I won't ask how you came to be an expert on what a whore charges though

i'd touch it with yours and laugh at ya

lol

**imdying** · 20th August 2008, 13:19

Originally Posted by FJRider

What I am curious about is your total ease of recognition, of who IS or IS'NT a whore...

Well, these ladies are making it pretty easy.

**yod** · 20th August 2008, 13:22

but where are the pics?

priorities chaps, priorities

edit: http://www.stuff.co.nz/0a28416.html

**FJRider** · 20th August 2008, 13:31

Originally Posted by imdying

Well, these ladies are making it pretty easy.

If they ARE what YOU say they are... its their JOB to make it easy... but don't ASSUME any of the "girls" with their top off is a "whore".

**Tank** · 20th August 2008, 13:32

a anti climax from the sounds (and I had low expectations).

Love this comment:
"“It was pretty small though, I was expecting it to be a bit bigger. The bikes were pretty good actually, maybe even better than the women,”

**slofox** · 20th August 2008, 13:34

New Tui Ad.?

"I went to watch the boobs on bikes parade today - but only to see the bikes..........."yeah - right

**imdying** · 20th August 2008, 13:56

Originally Posted by FJRider

If they ARE what YOU say they are... its their JOB to make it easy... but don't ASSUME any of the "girls" with their top off is a "whore".

Correct, they're not whores... they're stupid whores

**merv** · 20th August 2008, 14:11

Originally Posted by imdying

Correct, they're not whores... they're stupid whores

Ask how much they are being paid and then decide if they are stupid.

Good on them I say, yeah and where are the pictures?

**forkoil** · 20th August 2008, 14:15

Originally Posted by imdying

Correct, they're not whores... they're stupid whores

You are not related to Patricia Bartlett are you?

**imdying** · 20th August 2008, 14:18

Originally Posted by merv

Ask how much they are being paid and then decide if they are stupid.

Yes, post #11 is an assumption. If they're getting paid, then they're just regular old whores after all.

**scumdog** · 20th August 2008, 14:25

Originally Posted by imdying

Yes, post #11 is an assumption. If they're getting paid, then they're just regular old whores after all.

Sooo,,,your assertion is: They're whores 'cos they are using their bodies to sell sex (even if the don't actually do 'it')

ergo women who model revealing clothing, lingerie, perfume, make-up et al are also whores???