You don't kill tens of millions of people for money and land without having some sort of driving force behind it. Sure that driving force could, at the heart, be an ambition for land and money - but it'll almost always be disguised as religious or political move, with a fanatical support.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
all christians should be fed to the lions or burnt at the stake.
mormonisim is the only true tolerant religion
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Matthew 22:21 -"Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's"
The amusing thing is that this verse was in relation, to and later used as a reason for, breaking the laws of the land; specifically those laws around taxation. The phrase, attributed to Jesus, is sufficiently ambiguous that it can be quoted in favour of positions that are diametrically opposite to each other.
You would have been better off quoting Romans 13:1 - "Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God and those which exist are established by God."
But getting back to your statement earlier ... are you seriously trying to say that genocide is equal in severity to speeding? Are you insane?
There's a whole heap of insane/fucked up things in the world, what's the big deal?
You don't have to be part of the madness though. If anything Christians should appreciate that man has the ability to distinguish between good and bad... And that you have a responsibility to live a good life.
If organised religion - based upon these virtues or not - happens to be bad, then maybe the good man is the one who thinks for himself.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Unfortunately, the meaning of good usually gets boiled down to in accordance with god's law. And as anyone with an impartial interest in religion knows, god's law can, and often is, used as justification for whatever evil the perpetrator wants to justify.
Don't like jews? God's law says they must be killed.
Don't like abortion? God's law says abortion's evil, and so those working in abortion clinics must be killed.
Don't like alcohol? God's law says that alcohol is evil and therefore all pubs should be firebombed.
Etc. Etc.
One might expect someone with a faith to understand that man can distinguish between good and evil, but you're expecting that someone's interpretation of what is good and what is evil matches your own. And anyone with a strong enough faith is more than capable of perverting the understanding of good and evil enough to convince themselves that they are on the side of the angels, no matter what atrocity they've committed.
And as for thinking for oneself? Nope - that's something religion has a huge problem with.
I think about 90% of the posts on here really need to understand Christianity abit more.
Carver- im not even going to bother there.
Sanx - Alcohole is not evil its the over indulgence it actually states drunkeness not alcohole.. And i agree with that aswel. Especially with NZ's drinking habbits.
Gods law gets changed alot by people they like to see it and twist is in what ever way they can to suit themselves and yes it sucks. Hard to see it sometimes.
" yah trick yah "
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks