Oh, no, I crashed - and apparently I am at fault...?

[Number One]

You started it.

To answer your question, I'd suggest there was a good chance that your driver was distracted by your constant caterwauling.

You on the booze again Katman?

[Katman]

You on the booze again Katman?

Why? You looking for a fight?

[Number One]

Why? You looking for a fight?

I'm a lover not a fighter...

Why? Are you dying for another round old man

[Irontusk]

Are you back on the rag?

Have you ever been off the rag?

[Katman]

I'm a lover not a fighter...

Why? Are you dying for another round old man

Nah, check out my new location.

And besides, if I was dying for an old man, he wouldn't be round.

[Mom]

You started it.

To answer your question, I'd suggest there was a good chance that your driver was distracted by your constant caterwauling.

I really wish you could hear me laughing mate! I really do...LOL.

ROTFLMAO!

[Number One]

Nah, check out my new location.

Ahhh so you smokin weed instead...fine choice madam

[Katman]

I really wish you could hear me laughing mate! I really do...LOL.

ROTFLMAO!

I think I can.

The hair just stood up on the back of my neck.

[FJRider]

Ahhh so you smokin weed instead...fine choice madam

I think he's suffering from extreme sexual exhaustion...... time to use the other hand katty...

[Katman]

I think he's suffering from extreme sexual exhaustion...... time to use the other hand katty...

Yeah, I really envy you guys that only need to use one hand.

[niero]

OK, personal message to Katman, If I knew that you would sink that post down to "using one hand" I would not have posted at all. Second message, my responce is valid and fair, but who can argue rationally when you drop a bomb like "this does not valid a serious enough responce". Mate you seem to come off to me as a complete extremist. The way you set your responce is

1. Rider should be able to stop all the time, (well... wouldnt then bike wrecking business be a nightmare if that was possible)

Responce: In a perfect world yes... but in todays world thats not the case. You will not be able to stop if that same poor child ran on to the road, and dont even argue with me. In some sitiuations its just bad luck (not in my case ofcourse where it was bad judgement), as kb member "mom" just said sometimes where there is a blind corner and you are turning at x ks an hour and there is a stationary car in front of you, there is nothing you can do. Hey, have you ever ran over a possum before mate? Have your mates ever ran over a possum? Did you also ask them "Man, this could have been a baby, and you failed to react, you should be in prison" , your views are extrimist, and wrong, fair enough this accident was my fault but when a car fails to stop it doesnt mean that no matter what has happened that car/bike is at fault. This is just not right. (I hope that valids a serious enough responce)

[Ragingrob]

Yeah I'm bored

[Mikkel]

OK, personal message to Katman, If I knew that you would sink that post down to "using one hand" I would not have posted at all. Second message, my responce is valid and fair, but who can argue rationally when you drop a bomb like "this does not valid a serious enough responce". Mate you seem to come off to me as a complete extremist. The way you set your responce is

Just ignore the fucker... not worth anybody's time, ever.

1. Rider should be able to stop all the time, (well... wouldnt then bike wrecking business be a nightmare if that was possible)

Responce: In a perfect world yes... but in todays world thats not the case. You will not be able to stop if that same poor child ran on to the road, and dont even argue with me. In some sitiuations its just bad luck (not in my case ofcourse where it was bad judgement), as kb member "mom" just said sometimes where there is a blind corner and you are turning at x ks an hour and there is a stationary car in front of you, there is nothing you can do. Hey, have you ever ran over a possum before mate? Have your mates ever ran over a possum? Did you also ask them "Man, this could have been a baby, and you failed to react, you should be in prison" , your views are extrimist, and wrong, fair enough this accident was my fault but when a car fails to stop it doesnt mean that no matter what has happened that car/bike is at fault. This is just not right. (I hope that valids a serious enough responce)

Shit happens mate - I wasn't there so I can not say what's fair and what's not. However, it would appear that the collective experience (and opinion too) is that, no matter whether it's fair or not, you will be found at fault.

As I posted much earlier, your only possible defense - and that will only get you a shared fault if succesful I believe - is if the guy didn't indicate properly. It is hard to prove however, whereas there are a couple of dents that must be considered hard physical evidence towards the fact that you hit a couple of cars.

Best of luck.

[Katman]

(I hope that valids a serious enough responce)

A serious enough response?

Fuck me - you're kidding, right?

P.S. Don't listen to Mikkel - Scandanavians are known for inbreeding. Long winter nights, you know.

[Irontusk]

A serious enough response?

Fuck me - you're kidding, right?

P.S. Don't listen to Mikkel - Scandanavians aren't known for inbreeding. Long winter nights, you know.

So.. you only listen to those who inbreed? It all becomes clear..