I have the 250L as you know and it is similar in concept to the 230 in that there are quite a few differences compared to the good old 250R. e.g. Milder tune, smaller header pipes, lower compression, vacuum carb, paper airfilter, different frame and taller gearing. The taller gearing is entirely from sprocket differences - 40T rear versus 48T, so easy to change, but you'd have to change the chain guide.
The vacuum carb gives it a turbine like feel where it kind of winds up and doesn't just snap onto power like the old R did. However power isn't too bad with a reasonable speed for a 250 and totally miserly fuel consumption - like 26km/l and better.
I bought a 48T back sprocket for it but never got around to fitting it because I use my Yamaha for the trail type riding. The frame difference meant I had to adapt some Ventura pack rack brackets for it because Ventura didn't make them.
As a bike, I like it.
Comments about the 230 not pulling 100 uphill into wind is typical when riding a small bike - I've spent many a time with small Hondas nailed to the throttle stop in whatever gear necessary to maintain the best speed possible. Its all part of the fun of riding huh! The good news for me so far is the motors never seemed to break.
Bookmarks