Wow, I've seen spin before but this one is just so bad. "Little maori kid squiggles on a fence" Try two teenage kids (race isn't required) damage the property of a middle aged businessman (colour isn't required either). Now we see a slightly differnt take on it.
Now look at the remainder of your statement.... So the middle aged man has the time, energy and physical fitness to "runs back inside his house, grabs a knife (intention?), runs a considerable distance after him ", and not only catches the two of them (not just one) and then somehow manages to stab a fleeing teenager in the chest.
Sorry, this is just impossible to believe. Just the act of going back inside, getting a knife and returning to the boundary of the property must have taken at least 20 seconds. Even a 10 year old can run 100 meters in 20 seconds, then the middle aged man is able to run them down? I hope he's entered into the next olympics.
So how about redoing your post with the truth rather than the spin?
Time to ride
Old honky dude gets sick of taggers, grabs knife and goes outside to chase taggers, all concerned run until limp-wristed modern youths run out of puff before the older overweight honky does.
The taggers turn to confront him, two onto one, spray him in the face, he 'pokes' one with the knife (not a full-force deep stab) and the tagging heros wimp out and head away, one eventually calling it quits due to leaking the claret.
Overweight honky buggers off home thinking he taught them a lesson, forgot a brain is needed to learn a lesson.......
Just my counter to your earlier argument.
And glad to be of value to the tax-payers...
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
The defending your property angle is one big bullshit defence. The man willingly entered into a confrontation with kids armed with a weapon.
Defending property nonsense - so little damage was done that the prick wouldn't even bother claiming insurance as it wouldn't be worth the excess.
Again the spin. He wasn't defending his property, the damage had already been done. So don't go try inferring I've said something I didn't. The two teenagers DID damage his property, and I've no idea what his insurance excess was, but that is totally irrelevant. The damage has a value, and whether he would have paid for it himself, or claimed on insurance is not the issue. The first issue is that damage was done. Even you cannot condone that suely?
Then you haven't even addressed the question of how someone running away can be stabbed in the chest. Please explain that!
Time to ride
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks