Honda Fury

[outlawtorn]

Well, it seems that Honda are actually taking a chance and putting out something that isn't the same as HD/Suzuki/Yahama/Kawasaki (Oops, might get shit for that statement ).

What do you guys think? Looks like a stunner!

2010 Honda Fury Specifications:
Engine: 1312cc liquid-cooled 52° V-Twin
Powering the new Fury is a liquid-cooled 1132cc V-Twin, with a five-speed transmission and shaftdrive delivering power to the rear 200mm tire.
Bore and Stroke: 89.5mm x 104.3mm
Compression Ratio: 9.2:1
Valve Train: SOHC; three valves per cylinder
Transmission: Five-speed
Final Drive: Shaft
Front Suspension: 45mm fork; 4.0 inches travel
Rear Suspension: Single shock with adjustable rebound damping and five-position spring preload adjustability; 3.7 inches travel
Front Brake: Single 336mm disc with twin-piston caliper
Rear Brake: Single 296mm disc with single-piston caliper
Front Tire: 90/90-21
Rear Tire: 200/50-18
Wheelbase: 71.24 inches
Rake (Caster Angle): 38.0°
Trail: 3.5 inches
Seat Height: 26.7 inches
Fuel Capacity: 3.4 gallons
Curb Weight: 663 pounds
Colors: Black, Silver, Burgundy, Blue, Matte Silver
*All figures are preliminary and subject to change.

[nallac]

sorry to say...repost http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...ad.php?t=90527

i do like the look of it.

[outlawtorn]

Oops, my bad, couldn't be bothered ready the new models forum....

[vifferman]

Oops, my bad, couldn't be bothered ready the new models forum....

Don't need to - just click the "Search" button, and enter "Fury". The threads it's in are within the first few listed.

[nallac]

I never read forums,just click new posts..I'll read anything

[wysper]

I quite like it. But there is just something about the front that looks weak.
Anyone else feel that?

[vifferman]

I quite like it. But there is just something about the front that looks weak.
Anyone else feel that?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......................
Now that you mention it, it is kinda delicate looking.
It's them spindly forks.

Dunno that it's a Bad Thing though...

[wysper]

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......................
Now that you mention it, it is kinda delicate looking.
It's them spindly forks.

Dunno that it's a Bad Thing though...

added to that the elongated tank, narrow frame and big hole between engine and engine frame and tank.

But you are right. It is not necessarily a bad thing. It is just what strikes me about it. Pretty good looking Japanese cruiser though. Probably rather have something like that then the Boulevards.

[woodboats]

When I first saw it I wasn't to sure.
It's growing on me now. I can imaginea bundle of
aftermarket parts for it which will allow plenty of "customizing".
The 1300 engine is pretty sweet.

[The Lone Rider]

Problem I see is with the raised frame at the front to give it the arch and almost frisco style tank, the bike should be a lot longer to look natural. Or the trees should be lower to the neck and the bars at the same height as they are shown in that picture

[AllanB]

Cool, but darn I'd prefer a double disk front end on my cruisers.

[The Lone Rider]

Cool, but darn I'd prefer a double disk front end on my cruisers.

Yeah, I think that should be mandatory on all bikes now!

I have to get by with a small single disk on front and a drum brake at rear on my bike

[Jerry74]

I like the look but what sort of dollars will they cost???

[sAsLEX]

Engine looks nice.

Frame and tanks look like lego or some other stuck together shit, would prefer a seamless line from seat to headstock rather than a 1800s tech tube frame with a tank slapped on top.....

[Jerry74]

Pity its a Honda lol