yip.. yip... and yip!
yip.. yip... and yip!
ixion... in the modern parlance we need competency based training and licensing... do not hold your breath
We had a trial of that - the CBTA. It was a total rort.
And don't talk to me about horses. Stubborn pig headed malevolent cunning scheming vicious brutes determined to get their own way. Good thing I'm more stubborn pig headed malevolent cunning scheming vicious and determined to get my own way.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Another possible factor is that in right handers, many riders are leaning over into the opposite lane with only their wheels on the left.
We have had a couple of serious head-ons in South Africa with the rider striking oncoming vehicles.
I just had a read through that report and the same thing struck me that always strikes me when I read anything like this - the info I want is the info not available. What I want to know is this: how many person hours or kilometres of riding is involved per group? The report says that in 2007 there were 17 motorcyclists killed in the 40 years and over bracket, but we don't know how many kilometres were ridden in 2007 by motorcyclists 40yrs old and over. In 1981 there were 6 deaths in the same category, but once again we don't know how many kilometres were ridden by that category in that year.
The more time you spend riding the more you are at risk, logical really since it is obvious that the risk of dying while riding a motorcycle if you ride for zero hours is pretty damn low! The statistics could be showing a trend towards an increased risk of death or they could be showing a trend towards a decreased risk of death - I just can't tell due to the info I want that is unavailable.
Doing the thinking for you
Your right that I don't know anything about you, other than what I glean from a few paragraphs in a forum, but I gotta work with what I have!
ad hominem ....yes very nice!
My take puts folk into 2 groups..
Positive....those with ideas and action
Negative..those with critisism and obstacles
Rather than sabotaging the legitimate efforts of those that are doing something because you do not agree 100%, why not find some common ground and pitch in.
But again...you might be some kind of Motorcycling Messiah, and I just cannot see that from your negative and cynical posts.
In that case....keep up the good work!
Doing the thinking for you
Negative and cynical?
I think you'll find it's realistic and experienced.
You're very close to George Bush's theory "...if you're not with us, your against us and if you're against us, you're a terrorist." Goebbels 101, in other words.
And to reiterate, my original comment was aimed at the BRONZ spokesman who said:
I think I have every right to disagree with him, as not only does his statement go against my personal experience (which is extensive and includes participation in Racing, Event Organisation, Club Administration, NZACU and MNZ), and flies in the face of all studies in this area - the FACTS are that inexperienced riders ARE the ones that get hurt.But the Bikers Rights Organisation disagrees. President Finn Nielsen told Summer Report on Monday that he doubts a lack of skill can be blamed.
Furthermore I do not belong to his organisation and I do not think he speaks for all motorcyclists any more than Allan R Kirk does.
So how does my disagreement "sabotage" anything?
What gives you the right to direct this discussion?
You can crap on all you like about people falling into your simplistic groups, but I have yet to see you put forth anything other than the theory that we should support everything this unelected minority group says.
Because if you run wide on a right hand corner you will hit gravel/ditch/fence. If you run wide on a left hand corner you have the other side of the road to use and you will only be unlucky if a vehicle is coming the other way at the time.
Who is unlucky if you run wide on a left hand corner ?
Only those you kill.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks