Not quite. If I understand correctly, the nurse was offering to pray with the patient, not just offering to pray 'for' her at a later stage in private.
Although, of course, asking someone if they minded you fantasising about them while masturbating would be fairly offensive, too!
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
That sounds just.
I am pleased that she has been suspended.
No nurse has "offer prayers" or anything religious in nature in their job description.
It is unprofessional to impose your own beliefs onto a client/patient in your care. Especially when they may not be in a fit state of judgement.
"Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary - that's what gets you."
Jeremy Clarkson.
Kawasaki 200mph Club
You try to brush aside the fact that many people consider the nurse's actions unprofessional and offensive by saying 'overreaction'?
Sorry, that doesn't wash. Either an action is unprofessional and potentially offensive, or it is not.
In this case, it was (as is evidenced by the number of people who would be offended, and do consider that unprofessional conduct), and the nurse's censure was justified.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
And I thought that PC was all about tolerance. You lot are all just as bad as the INtolerant camp.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
A discussion on ethics is not normally very clear cut... especially when there is very distinct liberal and conservative differences of views.
May I add it is also considered unprofessional to encourage a client in your care to stop smoking only if you yourself used to smoke.
...and on another tack, discrimination towards people who smoked was always out of bounds for employers until very recently. Employers in the US can now DENY you a job just because you smoke. All because of money rather than ethics, you simply cost more in health insurance. but an interesting point on how ethical lines can be moved when money is involved.
"Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary - that's what gets you."
Jeremy Clarkson.
Kawasaki 200mph Club
It's not. It's in the Rant or Rave section.
And I take it that that comment means you have no comeback beyond 'it was an overreaction!' to my argument that the nurse's censure was justified?
I'm stating that it's not an overreaction, because of the significant potential for offense. Do you have anything to offer against that statement beyond a repeat of your contradictory assertion, or do you not?
If a nurse held white supremacist views and insisted on farewelling all her patients with a 'Sieg Heil!', would complaining about that constitute 'intolerance'?
Religion has killed more people than National Socialism, but social conditioning from childhood has normalised it in your mind to the extent that you fail to see it from that perspective.
Western monotheism is offensive to many because of the harm it has done and still does, in exactly the same way that Nazism is offensive.
It's inappropriate for any healthcare professional to express support for either philosophy to her patients.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
So if I was a mechanic and offered you a fag to smoke while bob was fixing your engine, and you said no, should I be scaked because I might of offended you?
-Indy
Hey, kids! Captain Hero here with Getting Laid Tip 213 - The Backrub Buddy!
Find a chick who’s just been dumped and comfort her by massaging her shoulders, and soon, she’ll be massaging your prostate.
If you were a mechanic, no. If you were a doctor, yes, of course.
Different levels of responsibility. Doctors and nurses have a particular responsibility toward their patients behave considerately.
And bear in mind that nobody's talking criminal charges here. The nurse was simply censured for unprofessional conduct by her supervising organisation.
And, to be honest, if you, as a mechanic, offered a cigarette to someone who had lost a loved one due to lung cancer, and they complained to your boss, it wouldn't be entirely out of the question for him to give you a warning and/or remove you from customer-facing duties.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
But how would one know if they had lost a loved one to cancer.
So the point you're saying is that people must be censored and not allowed to say anything, just incase some cunt in the next room might have their feelings hurts.
-Indy
Hey, kids! Captain Hero here with Getting Laid Tip 213 - The Backrub Buddy!
Find a chick who’s just been dumped and comfort her by massaging her shoulders, and soon, she’ll be massaging your prostate.
These days, everyone knows that durries kill you. In fact, it's probably less socially acceptable in many circles to offer someone a cigarette than it is to offer them a joint.
In that social climate, frankly, any professional who offered a client they didn't know personally a smoke would just be being idiotic.
Fifty years ago, would've been fine. Now, situation's different.
Don't try to strawman me. I'm simply saying that professionals, particularly healthcare professionals, should be aware of the social context they're working in, and not make offensive offers to their patients.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Perhaps that is evidence that it DOES work. No Christian with an understanding of the nature of prayer would pray 'Please don't let anyone die'. That's not how it works.
However, every Christian is commanded to do so. " Therefore, confess your sins one to another, and pray for one another, so that you may be healed. The effective prayer of a righteous man can accomplish much" James 5:16Originally Posted by The locationally challenged one
So, if she had not asked, just done it, would that also have been unprofessional (not a rhetorical question) . If Big Bubba decides to grant the prayer, is that imposing her beliefs?
Likewise, if I , for example, were to pray for Mr Random, who knows not whereof ?
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks