........or are they.....well lets see, they are two year old SIDIs, worn everyday more or less for my commute back and forth from work only, I never tuck jeans/leathers into them or use them for anything but their intended designed use.
When they were a year + old (and out of warranty) one of the zips broke.
I dropped them back to the shop I got them from (who shall remain nameless) and they returned them to the suppliers who fixed them and said "that if they broke again, to send them back for repair..no problem".
Skip forward to a year from then and zip NO.2 fails...so I send them back again, and I even say I will pay for any factory repairs required.
Different story now, "they are not interested in pursuing the matter any further" and its now up to me to get them fixed.
So I"m fine with that, I wouldn't have returned them in the first place if they had not said to.
Then I thought what would have happened if I had crashed and the zips had failed , leaving my feet exposed, is it fair to say just because they are 2 years old they are now useless and redundant (any new repairs not withstanding).
These are a $500 pair of boots to replace, I was hoping to get more life out of them then this...is that unreasonable?
The thing is I really like the boots in every other aspect and would have bought another pair.....but now, forget about it, its any other boots apart from SIDI in the future, and the new alpinestars look bloody good.
Is this just another example of our throw away culture???
Bookmarks