With the exception of the breath alcohol one, bad law because they attempt to address a problem by imposing a blanket restriction that does not address the problem, yet inflicts a loss of freedom on the law abiding majority
Problem: Some people drive at dangerous speeds. Valid solution - punish (or eductae) those that do. Actual solution, pass a law punishing all who drive at more than a certain speed , even if not dangerous. Even though the very people who caused the original problem will be the very ones who will ignore the law. Which is therefore a bad law
Problem: Some people misuse guns. Valid solution . Either prevent such people possessing them or punish misuse . Actual solution - well you get the idea.
The only legitimate one is maybe breath alcohol since if the level is set at a scientifically valid level it should not affect the lawabiding.
As to the drunk teenagers who bashed the man to death - would they have been any better sober? I doubt it, reality is that some folk are rotten in the core, drunk or sober.
Make those who cause a problem accountable for their actions. Don't try to let them off the hook by shifting the responsibility to a whole, largely law abiding segment of society
And as I think laws that do that are wrong, and bad laws, I do not consider existing ones valid precedent for passing new ones.
This sort of law making is like saying that because baby LillyBing was bashed to death, no Maoris should be allowed to have babies. It would solve the problem, wouldn't it? See how silly such laws can be.
Shit, if I'm not careful I'll find myself agreeing with Mr Oldrider.
Bookmarks