Hm. I have never experienced any issues with adhesion on concrete, even when wet.
And I suggest that the grip quality of chip seal is overrated. Granted it may be good when the seal is new and the edges of the chips are sharp. But I have observed that after a while, the chips become polished and rounded and then the grip becomes quite poor. You can spot the polished off chip seal when riding, I always treat it with great caution.
If concrete is so expensive, why was it used extensively for roads in the 1930s through 50s (those that were not gravel off course). There was less money then than now.
I have argued before that in fact , in the long run, concrete is CHEAPER than chip seal, because it lasts so well. Those 1930s concrete roads are mostly STILL there, buried under a few inches of hotmix. You can see them when they rip the hot mix off to relay it, and the concrete is STILL in good nick, after more than half a century.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools." - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
I mean like this : http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...ad.php?t=39552
After repair work, everyone understands roads have to be maintained, fresh seal is not a problem as long as we know about it. When the signs are not put up or taken away too soon then it is a problem.
I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..
Your safety is in your hands,not the hands of others.I don't care if nothing is ever done on our roads,they will revert back to gravel and I'll be happy.How long have you moaners been riding not to understand Ride To The Conditions?
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
too late
now please be kind enough to provide the friction coeffiecient for both materials
BTW: it's the basecourse and hotmix proportions that provide a road with its strength.
FYI: I worked in the construction industry for decades, rollers and pavers were my staple, FH and WorksCorp were my biggest customers
You are quite correct - chip does get polished. This is one of the things that sets the standard behing sources of rock for chip and the interval behind sealing.
Concrete was used back in the "old days" cause that is what the yanks did. It is a good material if you have really really crappy ground to go over, poor quality or not enough aggregate and very very high volumes of traffic (higher than we have in NZ). The last point explains why the concrete is still OK(ish) today - the very low traffic volumes. There are a couple of stretches still here in little old chch.
Damn it, yer allright, (ammo for you) it is damn expensive to lay first time round too even if it does have a long life cycle.
R
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools." - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
Done have the data re skid resistance off hand.
The the stength of pavements - basecourse provides the strength if thin surfacing like chipseal or <40mm of hotmix. Can stabilise the crap subgrade you guys have upnorth to help if structural pavement not justified. Structural (notice the name) hotmix or concrete is generally over 100mm. Apart from an airport and some very limited locations in auckland find me a site with 100 or greater of hotmix in nz.
What happend to works anyway. Down here in canterbury here are ambny instances of where they can build a chipseal road for shit. Use to do a good job but not anymore.
R
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools." - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
the honest answer to why NZ uses chipseal rather than other surfaces has nothing to do with friction.
it's about money, particularly in rural areas. gravel is relatively plentiful and cheap in NZ and often a crusher can easily be set up near a river bed where the material is plentiful.
the road designers do not pay much attention to the damage done to motorcyclists skidding along their chipseal roads nor to the highly elevated wear rates of tyres. Our costs are hardly thier issue, their costs define their ability to win tenders.
but we digress, the issue is not just one of current road works and the use of chipseal. As previously mentioned, it is about seemingly permanent potholes, shiny surfaces, truck damage, armco barriers and much more.
NZ roads are not designed or maintained with motorcyclists in mind.
You might as well ask why is helen in power. You are entering the relm of policies and politics which we could debate all day, I however have work to do building/validating a transportation model - been nabbed.
Read this thread for more arguments/discussions.
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...ad.php?t=29772
R
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools." - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
BTW cooneyr, I'm from Makarewa in Southland and a long time ex resident of Chch by way of Avonside, Lyttelton and Corsair Bay. Indeed a decade at least of my construction employment was in your region and Chch CC, FH, Works Corp etc plus the hire companies were all my best customers. I worked orignally for Compacting Equipment Ltd opposite Wigram. The company is now no more but you should define their business forte from the company name. We sold Sakai, BlawNox, Takeuchi, TCM etc
and thanks for underlining my point that it's about cost and that motorcyclists safety doesn't enter the equation mr cooneyr
it's been pleasant discussing this with you all and all opinions are appreciated.
i'll take action my way and of course you are free to join me or not
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks