911 conspiracy on tv 16 december

[WINJA]

Loose Change does not dispute that the Airliners hit the world trade buildings.

The Pentagon is the disputed issue, all video evidence was confiscated and has never been seen. Take a look at the photos after it was hit, where the hell is the fucking plane pieces...???

NO PICES CAUSE IT WAS A BUNKER BUSTING BOMB ACCORDING TO THE PROGRAM , I LAUGHED AT FIRST BUT WHEN THEY PRESENTED EVIDENCE IT MADE SENSE

[pervert]

NO PICES CAUSE IT WAS A BUNKER BUSTING BOMB ACCORDING TO THE PROGRAM , I LAUGHED AT FIRST BUT WHEN THEY PRESENTED EVIDENCE IT MADE SENSE

You can present information to say anything...Loose Change presents information saying it was a cruise missile...and backed that up with pretty good reason..

The whole situation is so hard to diagnose because there are so many different stories and accounts, witnesses can't even agree with each other in what they saw.

Certian facts do tend to stand out though, such as the the guy who's plane allegedly crashed into the pentagon, had retired from working at the pentagon and taken a job at American Airlines less than a year before the event.

No matter who you believe, Loose Change is worth a watch. The whole hour plus long movie is available to watch on Google Video from memory.

[Skyryder]

No matter how much evidence is put up against a conspiracy theory there are some who simply refuse to beilieve factual evidence. The crop circle consiracy is evedence of this. http://www.scifimoviepage.com/dvd/cropcircles-dvd.html

Loose Change has been thoughly debunked. It just seems sad that there are people who see things that can not be seen and refused to see things that can be clearly seen. The above link demonstrates that and the myth that 9/11 was part of a government attack so that they could wage war on terror or use that as an excuse for the invasion of Iraq etc etc is nothing but another example blindness. Bit like the Flat Earth Society
Yes consiracy theories are interesting and raise questions. But it is also an industry that is self serving. Look at it that way first and if no answers can be found...........................??????????????????


Skyryder

[pervert]

No matter how much evidence is put up against a conspiracy theory there are some who simply refuse to beilieve factual evidence. The crop circle consiracy is evedence of this. http://www.scifimoviepage.com/dvd/cropcircles-dvd.html

Loose Change has been thoughly debunked. It just seems sad that there are people who see things that can not be seen and refused to see things that can be clearly seen. The above link demonstrates that and the myth that 9/11 was part of a government attack so that they could wage war on terror or use that as an excuse for the invasion of Iraq etc etc is nothing but another example blindness. Bit like the Flat Earth Society
Yes consiracy theories are interesting and raise questions. But it is also an industry that is self serving. Look at it that way first and if no answers can be found...........................??????????????????


Skyryder

The official 911 commission reports are also full of flaws and holes, and can be "thoughly debunked" as you put it.

You don't know what really happened and neither does the vast majority of the world.

[WINJA]

And It Was Interesting How They Said The Government Had Planned To Do Terrorsit Acts On Its Own Citizens In The 70s To Get The American Citizens In Behind A War On Cuba

[pervert]

And It Was Interesting How They Said The Government Had Planned To Do Terrorsit Acts On Its Own Citizens In The 70s To Get The American Citizens In Behind A War On Cuba

That sure is interesting, and those facts come from from declassified government reports.

[The_Dover]

the 911 is just a beetle on Pee

[riffer]

Loose Change has been thoughly debunked.

As has the debunking of Loose Change.

So where is the $160 Billion of gold gone then Skyrider? This amount of theft makes the Labour government look like the mislaid some milk money?

[Kickaha]

You can present information to say anything...Loose Change presents information saying it was a cruise missile...and backed that up with pretty good reason..

How did they explain away all the eye witness accounts of people that saw the plane hit?

[pervert]

How did they explain away all the eye witness accounts of people that saw the plane hit?

They didn't, but there is also all the eye witness accounts of people that saw an object that was not a plane hit the building.

You should do some research on the matter, you clearly need it.

[The_Dover]

How did they explain away all the eye witness accounts of people that saw the plane hit?

they were all smoking crack.

crack is american pee.

[riffer]

How do you explain away all the people who still see Elvis?

[Skyryder]

The official 911 commission reports are also full of flaws and holes, and can be "thoughly debunked" as you put it.

You don't know what really happened and neither does the vast majority of the world.

No I don't but there are probabilities and possibilites. I'ts possible that the Americans did this to themselves but more probable that they 'did not.' It seems to be part of the Amrican culture to devise conspiracy theories. This has never occurred in Britain with the bus bombing, not has it occured in Spain with the Basques or for that matter the Madrid rail crash, nor in Japan with the Tube poisening. Conspiriacies tend to develop in America where there is a strong tradition of distrust in the Federal Government in particular.

Some is well founded as in the Waco incident.

Just out of interest I do find conspiracy theories 'intersting,' but usully with a bit of diligent research most, not all, but most can be discounted. 9/11 falls into the discounted theory. One other interesting thing about conspiracy theories is the more complicated the 'event' the more likelhood that someone will come up with a conspiracy theory. Both the Man landing on the moon and 9/11 fits these two example easily as there are a lot of factors to be considered with the result that much can be questioned.

Skyryder

[pervert]

It's not even a case of whether they did it to themselves or not.

There are so many more possibilities, such as the government knowing it was going to happen and not doing anything to prevent it, or even assisiting to make it happen.

[Skyryder]

NO PICES CAUSE IT WAS A BUNKER BUSTING BOMB ACCORDING TO THE PROGRAM , I LAUGHED AT FIRST BUT WHEN THEY PRESENTED EVIDENCE IT MADE SENSE

That's what makes consiracy theories interesting. They make sense and as a result there must be more than the authorites are telling. Conspiricies by their nature do not tell the other side of the story. They only tell what is relevent to their argument. Mind you Governments do this too.

Skyryder