$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
Yeah - lets paint a picture... let's say I do that. Bang Bang ha ha - got the fucker - he won't do that again... then another guy breaks into your place...
First person he sees is considered likely to be a lethal threat. He has the element of surprise and bang bang - you lose your life.
First rule of an arms race, the aggressor always has the advantage over a defender. I'd prefer to avoid that arms race thanks. Refer the US of A arming bears...
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
Interesting to read that "approx 500 guns seized" BUT "up to 20% may be illegal".
SO... how many were "dodgy"?
Then there is the comment on destroying all of the seized firearms.
IF an item of property is stolen, it has to be returned to the rightful owner before some public servant gets carried away.
THEN we have the fact that these raids have been executed "just prior" to a select committee hearing which is looking into arms laws??? Coincidence... (Tui time.)
It's the old story of the criminals being harder to prosecute, so the police go after the law abiding citizen as the easy target.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
I'm all for keeping a watchful eye on gun possession - lawful purpose an'all that...but...
Gun control ?? That's more to do with being able to hit what you are aimimg at!!
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
This scares me 'more' than the Police doing nothing as your post seems to suggest.
(quote) Mr Whitehead said most of the firearms police seized were held legitimately but when police found evidence of unlawful activity or trading, all the weapons in the person's possession were seized.
"Once we found evidence of illegal activity and commenced the revocation process, that obligates us to seize every firearm in their possession." from
http://www.stuff.co.nz/thepress/3906688a11.html
Fucking good thing too. Just who do you think these bozo's were selling their guns to Lias. But hey don't answer that. Can't have you getting all 'fired' up and slinging redeye's at me.
No one should have the right to 'bear' arms in this country. The right to bear arms is from the second ammendment from the American Consitution and refers exactly to that, 'bear arms'' meaning to carry them out in the streets and in society.
The constitution does not refer to ownership. Most gunners do not understand the difference and your post suggests that you are one of them. Look into the orogins of the second ammendment. It's not as the NRA or the now discreddited KKK seem to believe; that all citizens have the right to bear arms in society whilst going about thier buisness.
There is considerable debate about not only the exact meaning of the second ammenment but also to its intent. A 'well regulated militia'...........is the foundation of the second ammendment and the right to bear arms is in conjuction that intent. It is 'not' as may 'gunners now claim in a completly different society than when the constitution was written, to bear (carry) arms for their own purposes.
Gunners believe that they, and they alone are the only ones to have rights in this. They conventialy forget or have no thoughts to others in this matter. This is hightlighted in the retarded philosphy that guns do not kill, people do.
The 'right' to ownership is enshrined in our firearms law in as much that they are a fit and proper person, and so are the rights of others in relation to this law' their partners. As in most things there needs to be a 'fit and proper' balance in this respect. New Zealand takes this into account and rightly so. If the applicant's partner refuses to have firearms on the property then the applicant will not be granted a licence. Period. That's it.
I've owned firearms all my life. Dumped the last in the Police station few months ago when my licence ran out. I could have renewed it but decided not to do so. Bottomline if you are a responable collector you obey the law, same as any law. If you get caught youv'e got no one other than yourself to blame.
Skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
"They" do not have the right to bear arms in the US. The First part of that amendment is always conveniently ignored by the NRA.
"2nd Amendment A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
US citizens (in the context that it was written that means Men - no Women, criminals, Native Americans - O alright Indians) have the right to bear arms if they are a member of a State organised Militia and they have been mobilised for the defence of that State.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
No, but speed enforcement doesn't reduce the road toll either, just like tighter gun control won't stop firearms incidents. I would expect an academic like you to understand this though.
Speaking of the PM, does your boyfriend know about your Helen Clark masturbation fantasies?
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks