Strange. Some months ago I was saying that the pistol is the firearm that the average copper would have with them and need to use to it's fullest capability...
Here we have the evidence.
Once a year "recertification" shoots.
Slightly further away than the standard 3-5 metres that is commonly used in police training.
Rem 870's with the top folding stocks. Perfect for boarding at sea.
You guys have some of those available to you. The forward grip is fixed in place and cannot be folded up alongside the barrel though.
Shotguns are pretty indescriminate with their shot spread at the best of times. Having people with little training allowed to use these in potentially built-up areas will endanger bystanders.
That would be wonderful. There seems to be a lack of justice for the victims of crime in this country.
Not including heating, televisions, videos, etc, etc, might save some $$$'s.
The official medium for ballistics testing during the earlier phase of last century, was pig. (No sarcasm intended here to any of our officers). It replicated the human being and the effects almost exactly. Ballistic gelatin is a more consistant medium though, and luckily is bone free.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Well, if your pocket is deep enough , you can avoid the demerits by regoing the vehicle to a company and claiming that you cannot determine who was driving. (assumes of course that you didn't get stopped at the time) .
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Manifestly, the Parole Board were collectively incompetant. So do you consider that the family of the dead man (who suffer for the Board's dereliction) , and society (who also suffer) should simply say "Oh dear , what a pity, never mind , let's just carry on" ?
Why should the Board not be held accountable for its actions? If a mechanic is incompetant and assembles your car wrongly, so that you crash and kill someone, the mechanic can be found guilty of manslaughter (it has happened). Why should not the Board members be thus charged? Would you say that the family of the man killed as a result of that mechanics negligence had no right to be angry at him?
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks