I think that as long as the cops use sirens etc then they should be allowed to do what they do. This case seems to have been an issue because it happened at or near a school but surely with all bells blazing the Police have clearly made their presence known and adults, kids know the score.
Presumably the cops have to make a log of emergency incidents and like all of us in jobs, we can be pulled in for being wreckless in doing our jobs.
I think the cop has to be spoken to by his boss for the facts to be discussed but prosecuting seems a bit OT.
I agree that chases are a no brainer and the cops know the risks. The runner is only running because the cops are chasing. No chase........not worth the risk for a speeder or stolen car......no accident.
But as usual some here use this to castrate the Police
'Ere, wot 'appened to "Good evening, Sir" . And touch yer forelock when ya say it , too.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
"He said in Smith's case, the argument for the prosecution was that the Fire Service had given a situation report to say that all persons were out of the vehicles and that there was no need for urgency at that time."
"Smith was taking his children to school when told about the bus crash that morning and had continued to do that after he had confirmed he would attend the crash."
I think the above two 'facts' (don't trust journos), would be sufficient reason to lay charges. Having said that, I think (as some others have already said) that the judges decision is excellent.
"Judge Phillips, delivering his verdict, said he did not think the driving was dangerous and amended the charge to one of driving at excess speed on a road where the speed limit was 50kph."
And another victory for common sense. Acknowledging that an assessment of 'dangerous' requires more than a speed readout.
"However, the judge agreed with a further submission from Mr Dawkins that Smith should be discharged without conviction."
The judge knew this was about 'threshold setting' and as such was far more concerned with setting a precedent than with punishing someone who was simply trying to do their job well.
Fundamentally here the system worked, a lot of us argue for speeding just for fun, how about some consistency and argue for speeding to enforce the law.
According to pterry , they consume copper, not coppers. They usually prefer a nice cocktail, such as molten sulphur on coke with phosphoric acid, but perhaps this troll is Zorgo the Retrophrenologist ?
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks