...
...
Grass wedges its way between the closest blocks of marble and it brings them down. This power of feeble life which can creep in anywhere is greater than that of the mighty behind their cannons....... - Honore de Balzac
WoF is probably irrelevant in that scenario, rego certainly so. If it was a genuine accident, not exceeding speed limit, taking all proper care etc, and the poor bairn just hurled himself into the road, there is little reason to suppose it would end up with a gaol term WoF , rego or no. You might have an uncomfortable time explaining it to the police, mind you. And cop a lot of flak.
If it were shown that the bike had no brakes, and that a bike with proper effective brakes could have stopped in time, that's another matter. Ditto if the rider were grossly speeding (speed dangerous level, that's causing death by dangerous/careless/reckless etc)
But there is nothing I recall here that says the bucket wasn't roadworthy. That's another thing to no WoF. Nor anything to say the OP was speeding (though I wouldn't care to swear he wasn't , mind)
Never can understand why people get so holier than thou about rego. It's just a tax. Same sort of deal as a parking fee. Sure if you don't have a current rego, and you get pinged , pay the fine and don't complain. But there's no moral or ethical issue in it at all.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
As to ACC - if Mr W takes his bucket out on Sunday to the bucket-place and races it round and round , and crashes, he is covered by ACC. Exact same deal as if he crashed riding it up the road. But, on Sunday noone is going to ask him to pay rego, no requirement to do so. Therefore by your argument, is he not equally immoral riding it on the track , on Sunday, withut a rego?
As to ethics, it is a legal requirement. The law has little relevance to ethics and vice versa. Justice has somewhat more, but law and justice walk down opposite sides of the street , only accasionally encountering each other, usually by accident.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
It's not new. 40 years ago I used to get hassled by old farts for riding my mini bike.
Just do the biker thing and tell em to 'get ^&@%ed' and ride somewhere else.
Not with you. He doesn't need any of that at the bucket place. Noone's disputing he's breaking the law riding it up the street. And if he gets caught by the cops, he must take the rap.
But none of that is a matter of morality or ethic . Assuming the vehicle is roadworthy, and he is a competant rider.
I've had wofs and regos expire on me many a time. With several vehicles its hard to keep up with the damn things. If I get caught with no wof/rego I'll pay the fine without a gripe. But I don't see any moral or ethical issue in it.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Morals and ethics?? nobody is arguing about those - but if the law says you need them? well best you have them.
And as far as 'roadworthy' goes - and 'competent' goes' ?
I guess a WOF and a motorbike licnece would help a bit eh???'
Still, I suppose y'all would feel I was a tad biased, given my job an' all...
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks