Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 47

Thread: FXR vs GN

  1. #31
    Join Date
    24th September 2004 - 06:46
    Bike
    '76 CB550 Super Sport
    Location
    On the road to nowhere...
    Posts
    7,414
    Quote Originally Posted by dman View Post
    A real n00b? Well, kind of. Often I can guess at what is meant by stuff said here, but still.... I can not be 100% sure. So often I'll ask questions even when I think I know the answer, because I possibly I don't really know after all.

    Thanks for the reply, that is roughly what I thought. (those wasn't thinking in quite that detail!)

    Though still don't see why the GN250 is underpowered, I presume the design team was simply going for outright cheap. Or perhaps fuel economy. What is the design intention with a cruiser engine?
    GN250s have been out since around 1981 or so, so the original design concept has probably been long forgotten and the tooling for them has long since paid for itself no dought. It is a model that seems to stood the test of time and will probably be produced for a wee while more.

    The first paragraph in the '80s service manual reads-

    "The SUZUKI GN250 was designed to offer superior performance though light weight design, four stroke power (TSCC) engine). The new GN250 represents another major advance by Suzuki in four stroke motorcycles."


    Now some may snigger but what other Jap model, albeit made in China, has been in production for this long?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    For a rela n00b, a GN250 is an excellent starting machine. They are very tough, even unwitting misuse or abuse will probably not break them. And if they do break they are cheap as chips to fix. And can be fixed by semi trained people. The village "fixit" man.

    They were designed to be a simple, reliable transport machine, that could cope with almost anything in the way of roads, carry sizable loads, and keep going despite untrained (or no) maintainance.

    The design brief was "tough and simple; keep running no matter what". No necessarily cheap. the reason they a re cheap, as Mr Bonez has said, is because all the original capital costs are long since amoritised. They paid their way long ago.

    The measur eof a good bike is that it does well what it sets out to do. On that measure the GN250 is a very good motorcycle indeed.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  3. #33
    Join Date
    25th April 2007 - 20:21
    Bike
    Norco, Shimano 105 equipped
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    89
    arrrgghhh..... now I'm reading a bunch of very good reasons for why I should starting considering the GN250 again! But I think I'm going to stick with having changed my mind away from it, because of its very low levels of performances (which means it struggles with merely going on the motorway at legal speeds etc...).

  4. #34
    Join Date
    13th March 2003 - 11:47
    Bike
    2006 Honda XR250L
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    7,355
    dman it all gets down to how much money you want to spend and what sort of riding you want to do. GNs are cheap, but if you want something faster you got to buy a twin or a four.

    If you want to do road and trail and want a dirt bike they are probably similar top speed to a GN on the highway, but they aren't cheap. My 250 Honda for example was $9,000 new damn near three times the price of a GN at the time and once of course GNs were only $2,995 new.
    Cheers

    Merv

  5. #35
    Join Date
    27th April 2006 - 21:19
    Bike
    2006 Suzuki gn250
    Location
    bay of plenty
    Posts
    98

    Gn Performance

    Quote Originally Posted by dman View Post
    arrrgghhh..... now I'm reading a bunch of very good reasons for why I should starting considering the GN250 again! But I think I'm going to stick with having changed my mind away from it, because of its very low levels of performances (which means it struggles with merely going on the motorway at legal speeds etc...).
    Dont believe all those that knock the GN,they only do it because it is a recognized sport,like duck shooting but all year round ,no closed season!The Gn easily cruises at 110,and on the flat will make 120!
    All weather rider

  6. #36
    Join Date
    25th April 2007 - 20:21
    Bike
    Norco, Shimano 105 equipped
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by merv View Post
    dman it all gets down to how much money you want to spend and what sort of riding you want to do. GNs are cheap, but if you want something faster you got to buy a twin or a four.
    My riding would be to and from work. A little less than 100k per day. Plus whenever I go around NZ on holiday, a few times per year.

    Not sure how much I'm willing to spend, which probably doesn't help much. But obviously less is better! And certainly not more than 5k. Half that amount sounds much better.

    I've other things at the moment I'd much rather send my (not even yet earned...) money on. Though the likelihood I'm going to get hooked to this motorbike thing is very high...

  7. #37
    Join Date
    15th September 2005 - 04:40
    Bike
    2007 CB900
    Location
    Naenae here I come
    Posts
    4,170
    Quote Originally Posted by dman View Post
    My riding would be to and from work. A little less than 100k per day. Plus whenever I go around NZ on holiday, a few times per year.

    Not sure how much I'm willing to spend, which probably doesn't help much. But obviously less is better! And certainly not more than 5k. Half that amount sounds much better.
    I have now ridden both the GN and the FXR ... I love the FXR .. riding position was great, really comfortable and a lovely wee blat machine, but with limited speed particularly on hills and the Gorge in Wellington ... with someone my size, which is not small. The GN I rode today .... was an interesting ride ... the riding position was great .. seat was slippery (it felt waxed!) ... the speed was constant, it didn't really blat but would go 100 easy and stay there on the flat .. it also didn't have issues with the Gorge ...

    just my thoughts to add to the others.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    25th April 2007 - 20:21
    Bike
    Norco, Shimano 105 equipped
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    89
    Over all.... you prefer which bike? The FXR had better performance I presume?

  9. #39
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Have you considered the new Yamaha Scorpio. Only a few hundred more than a GN, within your budget, and a very nice bike. I have now had the chance to ride one (thanks to The Stranger) and I was VERY impressed.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  10. #40
    Join Date
    4th May 2006 - 21:21
    Bike
    2006 BMW F800ST
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    4,916
    There's a good suggestion for you dman. The Scorpio..since you are a n00b I will advise that Ixion is a veritable font of knowledge - in short he knows his shit and is well worth paying good heed to.

    It will be unlikely to kick you in the arse the way the RG did if you abuse the throttle and clutch.

    They are actually quite good looking for the money too.
    In space, no one can smell your fart.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    25th April 2007 - 20:21
    Bike
    Norco, Shimano 105 equipped
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    89
    Yup, saw that once in a shop. Haven't yet looked closely at it though. If I am to buy new then that would be one of only a few that I'd have to consider, but I'd gradually deciding getting a bike 2nd hand would be a better idea?

    There are none 2nd hand on trademe at the moment though.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    18th May 2006 - 05:46
    Bike
    DL650
    Location
    Featherston
    Posts
    673
    The RG150 is fun BUT if you are gonna ride about 100kms a day you might be better off getting a 250. I havent ridden a GN but a good mate of mine had one and I think its a great commuter BUT i wouldnt buy one *hiding*....but thats because I dont think they have the speed to get out of trouble *hiding again*
    Go on, click on the pic for larger version!

  13. #43
    Join Date
    24th September 2006 - 02:00
    Bike
    -
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,736
    Quote Originally Posted by dman View Post
    Yup, saw that once in a shop. Haven't yet looked closely at it though. If I am to buy new then that would be one of only a few that I'd have to consider, but I'd gradually deciding getting a bike 2nd hand would be a better idea?

    There are none 2nd hand on trademe at the moment though.
    No, they've only recently been released onto the market here in NZ, although they've been around for a few years overseas.

    2nd hand is cool, because you can get a better bike for your money (with the money I had I'd be lucky to get a scooter new), but mine blew up not long after I'd bought it. Better off paying a little more and buying 2nd hand from a dealer, as that way you have some recompense if (like many 250s have) it's been abused and goes bang.

    I suppose I sound like a scaremonger, and my bike was made more than 20 years ago and had 8 owners, so take my words with a grain of salt. But you being a n00b like me, it's better to have some sort of backup in case something bad happens.

    GNs have adequate poke, I think. You just need to work the engine a bit, use more throttle, pick the right gear. They (IMHO) look ugly as shit, though. See if you can find a Yammie SR/SRV/SRX for a good price.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    28th February 2007 - 20:54
    Bike
    klx400, IT200
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    57
    GO THE GN !
    Got so excited the day after I brought my first 'real' bike (GN) I bungeed a raincoat on to the back and rode from Nelson to Hokitika then back up and over to Christchurch on sat, then from Chch back up to Nelson on Sun (over 1000km). Met some cool people, saw the country and had a blast, you can't BUY memories like that !
    Ended up putting 50,000 k on that bike for the cost of a few tyres, an exhaust cam & frik-all petrol.
    Had my first 2-3 crashes, my first 'bike sex' and ended up selling it for the same price I paid for it...

    Having said that, nearly brought the wife an FXR as a first bike, so either way just get out and ride !

  15. #45
    Join Date
    5th March 2007 - 18:08
    Bike
    Gone
    Location
    AKLD
    Posts
    2,154
    I thought dman had settled on the RG150

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •