Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 76

Thread: Drive chain versus drive belt?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    9th May 2007 - 16:10
    Bike
    . .
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    4,513
    Don't notice any adverse effects on my Guzzi but then it doesn't rev very hard and it doesn't go very fast and it doesn't handle very well but by god it's a sensual ride. Every one should ride an old guzzi once in their life.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthrax View Post
    Don't notice any adverse effects on my Guzzi but then it doesn't rev very hard and it doesn't go very fast and it doesn't handle very well but by god it's a sensual ride. Every one should ride an old guzzi once in their life.
    For a perspective on how nice their current bike is?

  3. #63
    Join Date
    12th May 2006 - 15:24
    Bike
    Tiger 675
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    89
    belts are mechanically more efficient (about 1% versus 2% in mechanical losses), unfortunately unenclosed belts frequently suffer early failure due to stones getting between the belt and pulley ...

    when this happens it's off to the bike shop for a very expensive belt replacement and usually a long wait

  4. #64
    Join Date
    20th March 2006 - 22:22
    Bike
    ducati 900ss Harley XLCR café racer
    Location
    planet earth
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    I prefer properly designed belts.
    I'd never have a chain again given a choice.
    are you saving that harley has not designed the belts properly ??

  5. #65
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by popelli View Post
    are you saving that harley has not designed the belts properly ??
    Nah - meant properly designed for intended purpose.

    Mine has proved well designed for a gravel road. A Springer isn't - but it's a hornbag. Horses - courses.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    I played basketball with a bloke the owned one. He never missed a game - but they had a reputation for exploding - was it warranted?
    You're confusing the TX 750 Twin with the XS 750 triple.

    The twins had head gasket problems

  7. #67
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Pixie View Post
    You're confusing the TX 750 Twin with the XS 750 triple.

    The twins had head gasket problems
    ah - temporary acronymic dyslexia

  8. #68
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    I've owned and tested numerous shaft drive vehicles since the 70's.
    2 x XS1100, GS850G - and dozens of test bikes.
    Never experienced any torque steer with any of them. None. Nada. Nil.
    Personally I think on the reports with the Guzzis it's the flywheel.
    There is a lot of confusion about the various effects shaft drive has on a bike's dynamics.

    First: the twisting to one side that BMW twins,horizontal triples and fours,Guzzis ,Honda ST 1300 etc. can potentially exhibit,is due to a fore and aft crankshaft.It is not due to the bike having a shaft drive.GS 850s XS 1100s BMW K1300 etc. have transverse cranks and do not rock to one side when the throttle is blipped.
    In fact,you could design a fore and aft crank engine with a chain or belt drive and it would still twist to one side.

    Second: the shaft causes the rear of the bike to rise.This is said to be caused by the pinion and therefore the swing arm that carries the shaft,rotating around the crown gear and forcing the swingarm pivot to rise.Thus causing the whole bike to rise.This is true.However a chain or belt drive exhibits these same forces but they are offset either partially or completely by an opposing force created by the offset force path along the upper run of chain or belt.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Pixie View Post
    There is a lot of confusion about the various effects shaft drive has on a bike's dynamics.

    First: the twisting to one side that BMW twins,horizontal triples and fours,Guzzis ,Honda ST 1300 etc. can potentially exhibit,is due to a fore and aft crankshaft.It is not due to the bike having a shaft drive.GS 850s XS 1100s BMW K1300 etc. have transverse cranks and do not rock to one side when the throttle is blipped.
    In fact,you could design a fore and aft crank engine with a chain or belt drive and it would still twist to one side.

    Second: the shaft causes the rear of the bike to rise.This is said to be caused by the pinion and therefore the swing arm that carries the shaft,rotating around the crown gear and forcing the swingarm pivot to rise.Thus causing the whole bike to rise.This is true.However a chain or belt drive exhibits these same forces but they are offset either partially or completely by an opposing force created by the offset force path along the upper run of chain or belt.
    Blipping the throttle when stationery on the Guzzis and BMWs is part of the pleasure. Whey-hey the goeses.

    I agree with what you have said. But I am still yet to notice (or fail to recall) any gyroscopic or other effect in the course of normal forward progress.

    This could be attributable to my larger than average mass.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    29th October 2005 - 16:12
    Bike
    Had a 2007 Suzuki C50T Boulevard
    Location
    Orewa
    Posts
    5,852
    The faster I go forward the more effects I get...




    Must be something to do with my mass...
    You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
    Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!

  11. #71
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Edbear View Post
    The faster I go forward the more effects I get...
    Must be something to do with my mass...
    There is a difference between gyroscopic effect and spinning out. :-P

  12. #72
    Join Date
    4th October 2008 - 16:35
    Bike
    R1250GS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    10,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    Blipping the throttle when stationery on the Guzzis and BMWs is part of the pleasure. Whey-hey the goeses.

    I agree with what you have said. But I am still yet to notice (or fail to recall) any gyroscopic or other effect in the course of normal forward progress.

    This could be attributable to my larger than average mass.
    the guy was referring to the rise and fall of teh shafties...My xs750 e did this more than my k100rs and current BMWR100GS

  13. #73
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWST? View Post
    the guy was referring to the rise and fall of teh shafties...My xs750 e did this more than my k100rs and current BMWR100GS
    Yeah - I got it.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    25th January 2008 - 17:56
    Bike
    Africa Twin! 2018 all the fruit!
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    4,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    I've owned and tested numerous shaft drive vehicles since the 70's.
    2 x XS1100, GS850G - and dozens of test bikes.
    Never experienced any torque steer with any of them. None. Nada. Nil.
    Personally I think on the reports with the Guzzis it's the flywheel.
    Dave it wasn't torque steering, ie: making the bike go left or right. it simply made the back of the bike rise!
    My GS850 G also a shaft drive did not do this, somewhere between the early 70's and the early 80's they got rid of this pesky little problem.Wasn't really that bad, once you got used to it, but boy did it scare the pillions, the girls grabbed on much harder when that happened.
    Every day above ground is a good day!:

  15. #75
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    I can only re-iterate

    'But I am still yet to notice (or fail to recall) any gyroscopic or other effect in the course of normal forward progress.'

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •