I agree with everything preceding the the last sentence.
But if you believe the HD BRAND has nothing to do with it, you're in cloud Cuckoo land BD! The stereotype holds some water, perhaps more so that the stereotypes for scooterists and squidly ones. Say 'Motorbike' to Mr Joe Public, and he'll probably think of a Harley - I'd a say a bit of that is down to the corollary effects of VERY successful image marketing.
The brand has EVERYTHING to do with it for significant (conjecture and anecdote™) portion of those that own and ride.
Harley are master marketers - to the extent of successfully marketing a fully branded lifestyle to go with the bike. No one else does that to the same all-encompassing extent. And they've got a great market captured - the cashed up boomers looking to recapture their youth. (Not everyone of course, but if I were on HD's marketing team...)
Don't get me wrong, Harley's are nice bikes if taken as what they are (yerp, have ridden a Dyna of some sort, and enjoyed it more than I expected). I think their flaws add something that a supremely competent all-round jappa just couldn't capture - hence the legacy to build the marketing on, and a formula they don't depart far from ('cept for the xxxx Rods for those that wanted top-end power).
That sort of lifestyle-image marketing will always leave a reasonable portion of thinking onlookers cold. They aren't the target market anyway...
Now, Buell OTOH, much more about the merits of the bike :twothumbsI think you'd agree BD)
Trumpy - somewhere in-between. Heritage to bank on and competent, characterful bikes. Not quite the same all-encompassing lifestyle to buy into.
If I were to have a cruiser, make mine a Victory plz!
Bookmarks