Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 83

Thread: Best bike to suit a side car?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390

    Best bike to suit a side car?

    What are your thoughts?

    I was thinking a r100 would be ideal.
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  2. #2
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    I don't think the R100 was qualified for side car work. You need an earlier BMW or an old Brit machine.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  3. #3
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post
    I don't think the R100 was qualified for side car work. You need an earlier BMW or an old Brit machine.
    why ?
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  4. #4
    Join Date
    14th July 2006 - 21:39
    Bike
    2015, Ducati Streetfighter
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,081
    Blog Entries
    8
    Anything of decent capacity (say 750 plus) that's nice and torquey will suit engine wise. The rest depends on the 'look' you are after - vintage, retro or modern.

    Bussa anyone?

    There were a few GSX1100 (the big slab tank naked ones) with chairs in the 80's running around at scary speeds!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    There are three other significant factors (if you are talking serious chair work).

    1. Gearing. needs to be significantly lower than a solo. Not too big a problem with a chain drive
    2. Steering geometry. A chair on a sprotsbike will be a dubious experience.
    3. Frame strength . A chair puts a SHIT load more stresses into the frame , and in directions athat the designer never allowed for

    The question of HOW to physically connect the chair is also one worth considering. Steel tube frames, not too hard. Cast alloy, hm.

    You can't just stick a chair on any bike. Not if you want a safe and workable result.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  6. #6
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    why ?
    Frame strength and design.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  7. #7
    Join Date
    20th January 2008 - 17:29
    Bike
    1972 Norton Commando
    Location
    Auckland NZ's Epicentre
    Posts
    3,554
    Probably due to the rear frame being flimsy and bolted on....but I never knew that at the time I took one all around Europe on an R75/5 fully loaded.

    R100 would haul one nicely, probably without dropping the final drive.
    Wide bars and a steering damper would help....ideally you'd get leading link front end but $$$$$ and possibly certification.

    An XS1000 or any of the big shafty jappers of the early 80's would work.

    They are 'fun' but demanding to ride.

    I had a Chaing Jaiing a couple of years ago....fun even with the chair on the right and good for 'air' time lifting the sidecar.
    DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    The /5 (and I think /6) were sidecar qualifed.

    To some extent it may be just a "there's not enough people do it now to make it worth the paper work thing". Germans being what they a re.

    Some of the Brits used to have two series of bikes - heavy weight, with sidecar lugs. light weight, no lugs.

    Of course it does depend on the weight of the chair. A light box sidecar will be a different proposition to a Busmah DA.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  9. #9
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    are/were sidecars detachable?
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  10. #10
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Well, classic ones (ie not kneelers) certainly were. And you probably want a detachable, cos otherise getting a wof will be hell on earth (as will getting it vinned)
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  11. #11
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Yeah im thinking about getting a decent bike at the end of next year, and have always liked sidecars and boxer engine bmws. (but i dont know jack about em)

    what are you refering to with the /5 and /6?
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  12. #12
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Model versions. /5 was older /6 /7 later .

    Can't remember the years, but someone will

    Expensive now though for a /5 or /6

    Someon here (Rosie ??) had a BMW (R80 ?) with a chair. So the R80/100 series can take a chair. I'd still ahve some reservations about fatigue and so on over time.

    Even the Brits used to twist the frames occasionally.

    Bear in mind that spirited cornering on a combo will have the chair wheel a couple of feet in the air.

    That's a lot of weight levered off the frame. Even without a couple of hundredweight of passengers
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  13. #13
    Join Date
    7th November 2008 - 13:30
    Bike
    2007 GSX1000R
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,140
    A hyosung????????????

    Make sure you have a good swinger. Cause they'll need to push it along too

  14. #14
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Probably the best bet nowadays would be either a Harley or a Moto Guzzi.

    That said, they fit them to Vespas.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  15. #15
    Join Date
    20th January 2008 - 17:29
    Bike
    1972 Norton Commando
    Location
    Auckland NZ's Epicentre
    Posts
    3,554
    A /5 is the one shown on my profile.
    1970-73ish

    /6 to 76
    /7 to ummmm 79

    all much the same design wise.

    Sidecars were not approved by BMW after 1969....veboten.
    There was one at the Bikeoi or Bikehoi if you live in Wanganui.....heavily braced with a fibreglass Watsonian GP...which in the sidecar world are light.

    When I got the Chaiing Jaiing Vinned I was quietly told to bring it in as a solo.... the square section tyres were strange to ride on.
    DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •