My link doesn't allude to that at all. It says that ignorant people over rate their personal abilities and knowledge and that less ignorant people do the opposite.
Generally.
Generally speaking from my personal experience the more qualified and knowledgeable a person is the more generous of their time and experience they are, and the more humble they are. Provided the audience is listening. They will not give an inch when they know their subject matter however, and this can make less knowledgeable people anxious and defensive. Especially in NZ where a university education is sure fire way to make sure that people will respect you less than a wife beating professional sports person.
I don't agree with your basic premise at all. There's still a general prejudice in NZ against any form of higher education and it is often expressed by pointing at some wet behind the ears graduate and holding them up as representative of all degreed people. A lack of experience is just that. Experience successfully combined with a bit of knowledge can be a liberating and powerful thing.
The OP shows evidence of this bias by insisting that people who can write are all superior wankers who shouldn't be sharing their knowledge and experience because it makes people feel "bad".
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Agreed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture...ntellectualismAnti-intellectualism
Unlike many European countries, but in common with other 'Anglo' countries such as Britain, the United States and Australia,[citation needed] New Zealanders do not have a particularly high regard for intellectual activity, particularly if it is more theoretical than practical. This is linked with the idea of 'kiwi ingenuity' (see above), which supposes that all problems are better solved by seeing what works than by applying a theory.[19] This distrust of theory manifested itself in social policy of the early and mid twentieth century, which historian Michael Bassett described as 'socialism without doctrines': although the policies of the first Labour and other governments pursued traditionally socialist goals, they were not based on any coherent theory.[20] A major break with this tradition came in the 1980s when the fourth Labour and fourth National governments enacted a series of reforms based on free market ideology. This reinforced many New Zealanders' distrust of intellectual theory, as many consider that the reforms increased poverty and inequality in New Zealand. Despite the prevailing mood of anti-intellectualism, New Zealand has reasonably high rates of participation in tertiary education and has produced a number of internationally renowned scholars and scientists, including Ernest Rutherford, J.G.A. Pocock and Alan MacDiarmid. It should be noted that both Rutherford and Pocock spent most of their professional lives in Britain. For many years this was a common occurrence, and a consequence both of New Zealanders' attitudes and the low population which made it hard to support major research.
I have sometimes been bullied by my mates when I have expounded some knowledgable rant on a pet topic I have researched.
And called a kitchen bitch when I have prepared delicious food.
After a frustrating meeting of minds, the phrase 'bunch of hicks', could sit quite well with me.
Churches are monuments to self importance
Although it would clearly be disadvantageous to live in a society where the majority of people could calculate the volume of a jar but be unable to open it, nevertheless it is important that society have some members who know the formula for the volume of a cylinder and other apparently useless knowledge.
The anti-intellectualism noticeable in Australia and New Zealand mystifies Europeans, who manage to have respect for both practical skills and higher learning.
The irony is that in the past, when a university education was a rarity and trades were considered respectable, even "professional" people usually had practical skills (gardening, basic car maintenance, DIY...), while nowadays young people have been conned into believing that working with your hands is only for losers, so they rush off to university and emerge three years later with a BCom and a huge millstone round their neck, thinking the world owes them a living. But can they plant a garden, change a tap washer, build a cabinet?
Perhaps they can at least open a jar. But even with their university degree they probably can't tell you the formula for the volume of a cylinder, either.
Age is too high a price to pay for maturity
But, paradoxically, those same people who are devoid of practical capability are also devoid of erudition. They are turned out of the universities with a good deal of learning, but little education.
A truly educated person understands tap washers AND sonnets AND trigonometry. Or, at the least understands why he should want to understand all of them.
The Elizabethans said that a gentleman should have as many facets , and as variously directed, as a well cut diamond.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
You can aquire all the knowlage the world has to offer you,
Be taught in the best schools or universities that money can buy.
Be elequent in poetry, music and have read all the classics,
But unless you have the wisdom to use all of this,
you are worth no more,
than the begger on the street corner
To be old and wise, first you must be young and stupid.
I dated a dyslexic guy.he had trouble giving directions eg: differentiating between right and left etc.Facinating people to talk with but very frustrating at times as they can think and process differently.Most people can improve if they really want to.And if they can't, I accept it and move on.![]()
playing in the dirt
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks