If you love it, let it go. If it comes back to you, you've just high-sided!
مافي مشكلة
NOW is a very good time, as a motorcycling community to get very assertive about our place, right on the road.
This goes for wire rope barriers as well, how dare we even as a minority road user group have to put up with these sort of barriers that can be modified for our safety as well....fuck(excuse the language) transit to.
How dare we put up with law enforcement who should know better than pull a dangerous move like this tragic accident, that is the dumb of dumbness.
Just remember... "wherever you go, there you are" .....Buckaroo Banzai 1984
Mate I don't really see a lot here not accepting that there is personal responsibility in any rider in any accident.
However I do see a lot of justifiable anger over an accident following a definite trend that those who are supposed to promote road safety, apparently completely disregard it during the "heat of the chase". That's what this thread is mainly about.
If you love it, let it go. If it comes back to you, you've just high-sided!
مافي مشكلة
I think it's heinous discussing the victims speed - shows the brainwashing of the speed kills campaign. Even this tragedy they are using to maximise anti speed soundbytes. So what public health message is that - go slow as because you never know if a cop hiding ahead to revenue rake just may u-turn!!!!!
If he was at legal speed or not he was still likely a goner. He was clearly a skilled rider in proper safety gear and a few k's difference likely wouldn't allow collision avoidance given visibility range. 40k can be fatal on the wrong angle. In fact, the first road death in the 1890s was a pedestrian hit by someone described as speeding recklessly at 5mph.
No question, not a clever place to turn around thats a given. I'm no mathmetician or crash analyst but how far would a rider need to scrub off speed to make a collision either survivable or for a skilled rider avoidable? Has any facts been released yet on the actual distance from line of sight on the other side of the crest to where the impact occured? And one thing I'm still confused about is if, and it's a big if, the rider recognised/knew the ute driver and was trying to catch up AND what that neighbour says is true....Think I'll put off joining the lynch mob til some facts are in. Whatever the facts are, the only sure thing is that this was an avoidable tragedy. . RIP to the rider.
Thats dependant on a number of factors, speed obviously, and survivable is not a number, you can fall badly at very low speed and not survive. Something only the crash forensics will know the full story of is my guess, and I'm hoping its not hushed up. As somebody said earlier, its odd the guy made no mention of hearing the ute doing 154kmhr, but the bike sounded like it was speeding, sounds like some knob just wanted to get on the telly. And surely if they though the rider knew the ute driver they would have been able to have a chat with hiim by now? that sounds like poor journalism on the harolds part.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
That's just luck - if a gang of people robbed a bank wearing balaclavas or full face masks, and jumped into their get away vehicle, then if the cops don't give chase if they see the bank robbers, then there is a very slim chance of them getting snapped.
As for the psych patients, everyone is responsible for their own actions. I'm sick of hearing "my mum was an alcoholic and my dad was a p addict so that gives me the right to kill people". In other words, in that situation it won't be you that's responsible, it would be the psych patients fault for jumping off the building. Just because someone is fucked in the head it doesn't give them the right to do anything that I wouldn't be allowed to do.
Stuff today adds a new datum. They state that the rider was catapulted seven metres.
Now, I've done a bit of aerial motorcycling in my day. Firstly, a 7 metre flight is bugger all. It implies a definately low impact speed. Maybe 40kph, something like that.(Yes , that's a pure guess, but based on experience, and we're probably not going to see any honest figures based on anything more solid) . Certainly no way 150+ kph. Of course , that's after braking, if he did. But he had only 50 or 60 metres to brake , and perception time on top of it, he couldn't have scrubbed off from 150kph to a 7 metre flight impact speed in that distance. I'm sure there are others here who have flown a lot further than that (7 metres is the width of the road).
Secondly, a 7 metre flight would normally be very surviveable. Mostly just bruises. So he was very unlucky
Thirdly, a 7 metre flight fits with the panel damage to the car. that looks like a 30 or 40 kph impact damage to me. But it doesn't fit with shunting a heavy car right round through 135 degrees. An impact that would do that, you'd fly way way more than 7 metres.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks