We are talking about two completely different "truths" here:
1) people dont give a fuck about other people but money! (i agree, and yes iam the prime example)
2) "Speed Kills" campaign isnt about safety but about money! (well this is not news but it seems some of you still dont get it)
Its all fucking only about money!
I haven't read every post and this may have been covered but the truth of it's right there!!! Nothing personal r-soul but lowering the tolerence don't mean sqaut to the speeders. None of them travel at 104 anyway and the fines/Demerits are still the same for 120 or 130K over. So WTF???
Its just an exersize in stupidity, even the cops realise it and also realise what stupid damage the palimenterians are doing to there increasingly fragile image. Whoever dreamed this up needs a bloody good rodgering!!
On a Motorcycle you're penetrating distance, right along with the machine!! In a car you're just a spectator, the windshields like a TV!!
'Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out! Shouting, ' Holy sh!t... What a Ride!! '
well what else do u want me to call it ? user pays transport system ? effective policing ?
or how about health care expenditure reduction plan?
We have been through this in other threads , the roading policies are , lets just say not very well thought out
and if you combine the cameras , and contacts per hour , it adds up to a tidy sum entering the general tax pool
4 km tolerance is ridiculous
Stephen
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
That test by the AA involved ONE vehicle managing to complete the overtake. Considering the length of overtaking bays, this creates a decent blockage of traffic. There will be a shitload of pissed-off drivers out there if that happens!
It will be interesting to see the outcome of the long weekend, due to the kiwi mentality to go out and get killed on the roads. If the roadtoll is greater this year than others, will we see even more stupid approaches to road policing?
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Interesting. Call it what you like, no excess speed = no speeding ticket. It also means less chance of a crash happening, and less damage if it does.
So, slow down for whatever reason you want, as long as you do. No, not you personally, in generic terms I mean.
Ho hum.
Lets put the safety issue aside for a moment, is it really about revenue or votes? The government are seen to be doing something about the road toll that a lot of the public buy hook line and sinker. Speeders have now been tarred as the scourge of society, wrecking havoc all over our roads. The majority of the public are happy, even if they do speed themselves the odd time (but they're above average drivers who can handle it, not like that guy that just passed them) because the killers on our roads are being targeted in a way that doesn't affect them (for the most part).
It would be political suicide for the government that tried to introduce tougher license regulations. Stringent retesting every 5yrs, compulsory defensive driving and emergency car control courses. All of this would cost a lot more, so up goes the cost of your license to cover it (like is done in other countries), but it would do a great deal more for road safety than sitting on the side of a road with a radar. However, it would be a vote loser. After all, it's not us who is the problem, it's the other guy.
who will walk in front with the red flag?
its not the speed that i personally have issue with , its the general roading policy it could be so much better if a little thouht ( which has been well documented by European , canadian reseach institutions )
suffice to say the 80/20 rule tends to apply with drivers 80 % tend to drive to a safe speed / style as perceived by the driver with a few exceeding this
So on a long straight road , 80 % will drift to 110 ish , and a few will be 140 ish , but over a twisty mountain pass 80 % will be 60km and a few 80 + but according to the Royal smart person all rural roads are 100kph more or less
I personally find 100 kph a little to fast as I am used to Japanese roads which are small and crowded also do no have footpaths so the average speed between 40 and 60 kph ( actually I used a gps the other day to measure my average speed when the wife went to pick up the new curtains ., just over 20 kph for the whole journey , peaking at 30 something
Basically IMHO , crashes cost money , and higher speed crashes tend to cause more damage , which needs more health care dollars , soooo.... reduce the speed, reduce the spending , doesn't address the basics ( we have no money and are shocking drivers )
Stephen
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
Precisely so. I never speed myself, or course, becasue speed kills (this I know for the government tells me so). But those who DO speed won't be at al laffected by this, because , by definition, they're not travelling at 105-110 anyway.
The person who will be affected is Stan who travels at (he thinks) 100kph. And is loud in condemning those idiot speeders. But in reality he often drifts up to 110, because he isn't paying attention .(He never does). So now he will maybe get caught. Which will make him as loud in denouncing the cops as in denouncing speeders . Way to go, make friends and get the public on side, Mr Broad.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks