
Originally Posted by
Ixion
It's not a leaky building problem. It's a rotting building problem. All wooden buildings leak, sooner or later. Always have. Which is why ,for 50 years, anyone who knew which end of a hammer was which knew that you didn't use untreated pine .
Then some big corporate saw a chance for more profits, got the rules changed, and architects started specifying untreated pine.
Now the buildings are rotting. Gee, who'd have thought.
Not the chippies fault, they just follow what's on the plans. Ask, who made money out of using untreated pine
True but lets not forget the Green party who were pushing for untreated framing. The BIA advised government that the untreated timber would fail but they ignored it. The govt made it an acceptable solution that BCA's (councils) could not reject. They also allowed the use of direct fix fibre cement, plaster, poly etc (which they no longer allow) and in fact their agency BRANZ even appraised them and approved them. By and large councils and builders aren't half as much to blame as the govt. The latest deal 25% + 25% is fair given that a good portion of the blame lies with the market itself (home owners) who demanded the cheapest prices which forced declining standards.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Bookmarks