
Originally Posted by
TZ350
.
I think Chambers is going with a conventional 24 first, then when the bugs in the rest of the new bike are ironed out he might try the 38/24.
But yes, 38/24 feeding both cylinders. We have been successful with a 28/24 combo on the GP125 and now have a 38/24 that shows real promise on the flow rig.
One of the problems I can see, is low signal strength at the main jet. Our 28/24 run conventualy uses a 130 main. Keihin 38s on 125 MXs run 180-190 mains std.
So I expect that on a 38/24, the main will need to be even bigger. Because of the reduced signal from lower airflow passing through the 38mm metering section at full throttle due to the more restrictive 24mm venturi section of the carb down stream.
My guess is 200+ for the main on our 125's using a 38/24 venturi carb...................
Also we figure, if you can't drop a 24mm ball brg through a carb with a circular throat then the cross sectional throat area is equivalent to or less than a carb of 24mm and so satisfies the 125 2-Stroke carb rule.
The beauty of the 38/24 combo seems to be that the airflow in the 38 section gets straightened up before entering the 24mm venturi allowing a higher flow rate in the venturi area.
The details and pictures are in earlier posts. From memory, if the venturi is 60-70% of the pipe (carb) diameter then there is a 94-98% pressure recovery (air flow) down stream for Reynolds (gas velocity) numbers less than 0.5.
So you can see that its possible to make a 38/24mm combo carb that flows like a conventional 34mm. But wether it works on the track we wont know untill we get one of the new bikes going.
Remember you heard about this idea of 38/24 and 28/24 carbs from Team ESE first..............
Bookmarks