Why are you being so evasive?This comment would have validity if members of those organisations were paid members, doing this for a job. As they are unpaid voluntary members of these organisations I suggest the payment is for their INDIVIDUAL services rendered. The individuals were chosen INDIVIDUALLY BY THE MINISTER because HE BELIEVED that they would do the best by motorcyclists, not because of any advocacy by the representative motorcycling groups. There is one odd one out, the member of AA, who was added after extensive lobbying by the Automobile Association.
However all members are there as individuals.
What's your point?
What does it matter to you? Look up in ACC's annual reports for what they pay consultants for meetings. This will give you an idea. It's not an unreasonable amount IMO.
Again, what's your point?
Each member gets one vote. Look at each member's organisation's annual reports if you want to know how many members there are. However, as I have already indicated, given that each member is there not to represent their organisation but due to their individual abilities, it's neither here nor there.
I think you're trying to put a spin on things that really isn't there mate.
Bookmarks