No twisting of facts. Both the rider & driver had been drinking at farmer 'Joes', although the driver was a later arrival. Surprised it came out so quick.
It's before the courts so perhaps we should all wait for the facts before casting aspertions.
It is twisting. The facts are what they are. How they are stated paints a picture - in this case, one that attempts to make the cop involved look better.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
While it is fashionable and so KB to criticize media and police reports for how they present facts I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of what has been reported. Negative is nil and below the limit is above nil - end of story.
Here for the ride.
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Also interesting that, as quoted in the story;
"An expert engineering consultant estimated Mr Brown was travelling between 135 and 155kmh before he hit his brakes."
The upper limit of this speed is very close to the speed check of 154 km/h that was the cause of this U turn.
Could it be possible both vehicles were racing?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks