i think farmers fall into the "rich prick" category according to labour
i think farmers fall into the "rich prick" category according to labour
We are oft to blame in this, —
'Tis too much prov'd, — that with devotion's visage,
And pious action, we do sugar o'er
The devil himself.
You can guess which book Im reading at the moment
Stephen
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
So why is it that the most poluted land in this country per square metre...[and not by a little bit by a massive margin] is the towns....why don't the hippocrite townies clean up their backyards before whinging about ours....once again Jim....not sure whats up with yo lately....but...totally uninformed post!!
ya know...I just found this thread....and got to your post after making a few replies...and I starting thinking the same thing....also....Labour have found the Idiots with selfish little brains they need to vote for them....I give up...people will belive what ever the hell they want...I just get really pissed with people who are so UNINFORMED...they are just so stupid in my mind....seriously..I dunno.
Jim you are an intelligent man and you know better than this. The beginning wages in many industries are below the fast high wages in on again/off again jobs or the raw stuff like mining.
I've seen this happen. Dairy employees have the chance to breed their own stock if they are competent and reliable. As this grows they move on to short-order sharemilking all the while growing their own herd larger every year.
After about ten years they are in a position to buy a run-off block or rental house, and they keep working. 24/7. For years. By the time a sharemilking couple are 35-40 they will be buying their own dairy farm.
It isn't quick. It isn't easy. It isn't even guaranteed. But eventually for the switched on ones who think, plan, and work, they succeed.
I don't know the average farmers age but it used to be 57. Its a lifetime commitment and worth it to those who want it. Same for engineers, architects, doctors, retailers etc. Nothing worth doing is easy.
You're my new best friend!
LOL
I've quoted Mark Twian before but it is worth doing so again;
If you don't read the papers you are uninformed.
If you do read the papers you are misinformed.
Thank you Mr Twain. Unfortunately the truth isn't news and the news isn't truth.
When you take the path of producing a society of consumers the first skill you must reduce is the ability to think independantly and critically.
Take a moment to have a look at this link (v short I promise)
http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/mi...lves-to-death/
"I don't like it, and I'm sorry I ever had anything to do with it." -- Erwin Schrodinger talking about quantum mechanics.
because people have been trained to believe the propoganda bullshit ...
You can be deluded about cowpoos - he strokes your ego .. but I can't lead the KB comment go - that's way too self-delusional.
PS loved the link to the cartoons above ... I would add a slight paraphrase of mark Twain ... Those who do not read have no advantage over those who cannot read.
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
There will never be a time when the truth reigns on earth. Anyone who wants to live a live worth living should celebrate that fact, since the idea of any kind of pure truth is fundamentally anti-life. But there may be a time when less lies are told in the name of truth, and less lives destroyed through its misuse.
Many will say, but how can we deal with lies, distortions, misperceptions, half-truths and much else if we have no standard of truth against which to measure and expose what’s false? A crucial question, since while there may be no absolute truth, that hardly rids the world of lies.
What we need, it seems, is a notion of truth as partial rather than absolute, as insight rather than obfuscation. Insight allows us to understand more clearly, but not absolutely and certainly not finally.
A concept of truth, then, as fundamentally situational. Not beyond conditions, but lodged in them. Not the answer to conditions, but as something that allows us to understand the sources of conditions, and where those conditions are tending.
http://wallacethinksagain.blogspot.com/2008/01/you-cant-handle-truth.html
KB 'truth anyone?
"I don't like it, and I'm sorry I ever had anything to do with it." -- Erwin Schrodinger talking about quantum mechanics.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks