Page 22 of 35 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast
Results 316 to 330 of 518

Thread: The welfare state

  1. #316
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,125
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian d'marge View Post
    should have saved the money ...if its good enough for me then its good enough for them

    Stephen
    It's good enough for those living and working in New Zealand ...

    Don't like it ... vote for change ...
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  2. #317
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    PopTart Katoona
    Location
    CT, USA
    Posts
    6,542
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by FJRider View Post
    ... and/or serving at least one world war ... ???
    Don't they have some sort of millitary super or something? I recall a friend of mine quit the navy about 5 years ago and had 50K super go into his bank account (I think he had done like 5 years or something).
    Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.

  3. #318
    Join Date
    16th December 2006 - 01:50
    Bike
    Trans NZ Broliner
    Location
    Stuck on a roundabout
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian d'marge View Post
    Remember its the old people that cost the money ...we would save at least half of Social welfare just by getting rid of Old people

    Stephen
    I'll vote for that, I hate old people
    Churches are monuments to self importance

  4. #319
    Join Date
    21st December 2010 - 10:40
    Bike
    Kate
    Location
    Kapiti Commute
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by scissorhands View Post
    I'll vote for that, I hate old people
    Your definition of old changes the more you live. To a five year old you are old in not ancient.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gO7u...yer_detailpage

  5. #320
    Join Date
    5th November 2009 - 09:50
    Bike
    GSXR750, KTM350EXCF
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian d'marge View Post
    The Pension should follow ACC , risk and income assessed, In a society that one should stand on their own two feet, and make provisions for their retirement. I dont see why my taxes should be used .....

    Far better using that money for the productive members of society

    Stephen
    This would have to be one of your dumbest statements yet. How can a pension be risk assessed??
    How do you define a productive members of society? I know many people over 65 that a) are still working and b)work a dam site harder than a lot of 20 year olds.


    Quote Originally Posted by Brian d'marge View Post
    should have saved the money ...if its good enough for me then its good enough for them

    Stephen
    So under that statement you agree with my earlier post of no welfare hand outs at all to anyone.

  6. #321
    Join Date
    5th November 2009 - 09:50
    Bike
    GSXR750, KTM350EXCF
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,264
    Quote Originally Posted by FJRider View Post
    It's good enough for those living and working in New Zealand ...

    Don't like it ... vote for change ...
    But that is the problem isn't it?
    With so many now getting hand outs it would be political suicide to say that you will stop them. so we just end up with more of the same.
    As most vote either National or Labour it won't change.
    The only way to make change is to completely change the voting structure so only one party governs as with so many deals to be done the status quo is the easier and better political option.

  7. #322
    Join Date
    21st December 2010 - 10:40
    Bike
    Kate
    Location
    Kapiti Commute
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian d'marge View Post
    The Pension should follow ACC , risk and income assessed, In a society that one should stand on their own two feet, and make provisions for their retirement. I dont see why my taxes should be used .....

    Far better using that money for the productive members of society

    Stephen
    the possibilities here. "As you earn big money and work in a low physical impact job we asses your risk of requiring a pension as low Mr Financier" a few years later the conversation continues ... "What do you mean your business went bankrupt and now you don't have a penny and it all happened the day of your 65th birthday? Oh and I see your house, car and boat are all own by your children's trust"

  8. #323
    Join Date
    13th May 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Thinking
    Location
    Around
    Posts
    7,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian d'marge View Post
    The Pension should follow ACC , risk and income assessed, In a society that one should stand on their own two feet, and make provisions for their retirement. I dont see why my taxes should be used .....

    Far better using that money for the productive members of society

    Stephen
    Hang on a sec, within the Tax I pay isnt there a component that is attributed towards retirement/ namely my retirement? yes would be the answer to that so on the basis of what youre saying I want one of two things
    1/ the pension
    or
    2/ a refund of all that which I have paid, and a deduction of tax !!

    fucking government would love to take the same yeild while reducing its services, fuck them I want what I pay for and demand it!

  9. #324
    Join Date
    5th November 2009 - 09:50
    Bike
    GSXR750, KTM350EXCF
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Howie View Post
    Fortunately I don't see this happening any time soon. As I for one would not want to live in a society where the those in need aren't looked after. What would happen do you think if all Benefits were stopped?

    Would you want to live with Bars on your windows? In Compounds with 24 hour security? Carry a gun to protect yourself at all Times? Mind you it would create a few more jobs in security, and the police. Hang on a minute aren't the police paid out of the tax revenue?
    Like i said just too simplistic as there is also health, having to pay for health care would make us end up like the USA and i for one don't want to see us go down that road.

    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    I disagree.


    We pool our assets. Everyone in the country.
    We have had this discussion many times but i have just realised that your pooling of resources and my no benefits are exactly the same idea but looking from different points of view.

    The end result will still be the same you either let the non productive's get an easy ride or you let them fend for themselves and this is where we differ, you are using the whole country where i am using only the family.

    If we pool the whole country, whole family's get a free ride and in so doing train the next generation to be the same something like we are doing now, where if it is only the family's resources they will quickly change to having to fend for themselves or at least change the mindset of the next generation.

  10. #325
    Join Date
    24th July 2006 - 11:53
    Bike
    KTM 1290 SAR
    Location
    Wgtn
    Posts
    5,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian d'marge View Post
    In a society that one should stand on their own two feet, and make provisions for their retirement. I dont see why my taxes should be used .....
    I reckon you're taking the piss.

    Given that any pension I'm likely to get ammounts to a pittance I've been trying to put a bit extra away for my dotage for a couple of decades. It's a pointless excercise, unless you earn many times the average income or earn it without paying tax on it you're fucked. Taxation is structured in such a way as to mop up pretty much everything you might have put aside.

    So the best strategy there looks very similar to those that've fucked our economy through the working years: If you can't hide your income then don't bother trying to provide for yourself beyond the absolute minimum, they'll just take at off you and give it to those who've contributed fuck all.

    But hey, you roll us back 30 odd years and change the tax structure so it's actually possible to save for your own retirement and give me a call eh?
    Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon

  11. #326
    Join Date
    24th July 2006 - 11:53
    Bike
    KTM 1290 SAR
    Location
    Wgtn
    Posts
    5,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Winston001 View Post
    Yessss...so people didn't pay tax in those days for a future pension?
    Of course not.

    It was a Labour government, budget? Pfftt.
    Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon

  12. #327
    Join Date
    5th November 2009 - 09:50
    Bike
    GSXR750, KTM350EXCF
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Ocean1 View Post
    I reckon you're taking the piss.

    Given that any pension I'm likely to get ammounts to a pittance I've been trying to put a bit extra away for my dotage for a couple of decades. It's a pointless excercise, unless you earn many times the average income or earn it without paying tax on it you're fucked. Taxation is structured in such a way as to mop up pretty much everything you might have put aside.

    So the best strategy there looks very similar to those that've fucked our economy through the working years: If you can't hide your income then don't bother trying to provide for yourself beyond the absolute minimum, they'll just take at off you and give it to those who've contributed fuck all.

    But hey, you roll us back 30 odd years and change the tax structure so it's actually possible to save for your own retirement and give me a call eh?
    And the real "kick in the guts" is if you do save so you have a bit extra you are penalised for it by being taxed again.

    and they wonder why there are so many trusts and people hiding things in company's.

  13. #328
    Join Date
    21st January 2010 - 12:21
    Bike
    The Black Pearl
    Location
    Vegas Az
    Posts
    1,468
    Blog Entries
    3
    Go down to your local SPCA, Red cross, Salvation army, YMCA, Marae, church, community garden, volunteer organisation of choice, and find out how many beneficiaries are there putting in a solid effort to help out. Compare that with the number of willing workers there, who are either supported by a spouse/partner in the workforce, or workers who are there during their time off. Then tell me again how deserving most of these beneficiaries are.

    When my g/f at the time moved in with me, she was not on a benefit, but had no work, having left her home town. She went and volunteered at the SPCA cleaning shit from cages, smiling nicely at cunts who were abandoning their 'pets', and doing the run to the vets for the euthing. She'd drop in to feed the critters on Xmas day. Within a couple of months someone came in and offered her a job.

    It was one of those jobs that nobody really wanted to do, and she literally wore through the soles of two pairs of shoes doing it.

    Yeah I married her
    Keep on chooglin'

  14. #329
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    yes we have. I see how you could see it that way. How are they exactly the same ideas? I understand the different points of view, but I don't see the similarities at all.

    The end result will be MASSIVELY different. When I was talking about high unemployment rates before, I was talking about it being in the millions, not just a couple hundred thousand that don't want to work, but people who don't have to work . Your way requires 0 unemployment. Sure there will be perceived easy rides under both systems, but in my version the lazy still get fed and noone would really notice them amongst the millions of unemployed, "bludger" problem solved (amongst many others). Your way penalises families for perceived lack of effort, irrespective of hardship or circumstance and smacks of resentment and pettiness... and all because you perceive that you are doing more work than someone else? ...

    That's a mighty negative way of looking at it (They can eat themselves to death on KFC for all I care)... ... you've not lived amongst unemployed people for extended periods of time have you? I have seen some of the kids from the street go to jail, some that went on to further education, some that headed off abroad to work, some head down souff (UK), some become gang members, others join the long family tradition of screwing the system ... they are not stupid prople, they are all intelligent smart bastards in their own ways. They are not lazy, they are efficient with their time, they realise that a low paying job isn't a fair trade off in regards to time v effort they'd have to put in re: cost of living etc... so figure out a smarter way to achieve their level of cashflow... in essence their children want more for themselves... it isn't just the family that guides the child

    So please, show me where the similarities are again?
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  15. #330
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Quasievil View Post
    Hang on a sec, within the Tax I pay isnt there a component that is attributed towards retirement/ namely my retirement? yes would be the answer to that so on the basis of what youre saying I want one of two things
    1/ the pension
    or
    2/ a refund of all that which I have paid, and a deduction of tax !!

    fucking government would love to take the same yeild while reducing its services, fuck them I want what I pay for and demand it!
    See .. there's the problem right there .. the Pension was supposed to be for people who needed it - then the non-needy middle class began to demand it on the basis that they had paid taxes all their lives and deserved it - not needed but DESERVED it ...

    So people like Don Brash and other rich Capitalist fuckers get a pension because of entitlement - and cost us millions ...

    Pensions for those who need it - not for those who don't - Means test the Old Age Pension .. or whatever it's fucking called nowadays ..
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •