SlutWalk

[nodrog:Me]

I may be a retard

Careful, some Autistic Woman might rape you.

[imdying]

They're autistic, not blind.

[scumdog]

Rape, women and autism is an extremely close association whether you like it or not.

And booze.

Don't forget the booze....

[avgas]

Rape, women and autism is an extremely close association whether you like it or not.

Know many Autistic women rapists do you?

[avgas]

So why call it a Slut March?

Because "Erection Protest" would never be allowed to play on the news.

[nodrog:Me]

Know many Autistic women rapists do you?

7

_______________

[Spearfish]

Because "Erection Protest" would never be allowed to play on the news.

Yeah it wood...

[Banditbandit]

Yeah it wood...

Fuck em if they can't take a joke ...

[scissorhands]

Know many Autistic women rapists do you?

I know of a few autistic guys falsely accused of rape, Aaron Farmer $350k? I believe the figures are high enough to be significant

Its a kind of reverse rape, due to a spurned women/divorcee/lying angry drunk drugged woman, where an [innocent] male gets fucked up/has his ass raped by someone else, for saying something stupid or inadvertently insulting the female sex partner and accuser. Or vengeful woman wanting to hurt a former lover

Equal rights eh?

[superman]

Equal rights eh?

It's all a bunch of bullshit.

There's a "women's space" at university, even though university institutions have had higher numbers of women for quite a while now. Their justification is they need a place they can feel safe and free from men.

Where's the men space? Not that the men would want it. But it would be like creating a "white space" because there is a higher assault rate coming from non-whites just like a higher sexual assault rate from men than women. You don't segregate for such things, modern society should be trying to rid itself of such ridiculousness. Odd enough that people think it's justified that the public has single sex bathrooms.

SOCIETY STUPID!

[jazfender]

But that shit ain't the truth, and beating up some cop because he manned up and stated the facts just ensures that less people will do it. That'll lead to less education on these sorts of topics, not more.

Stated facts? He said women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized. That isn't fact, that's opinion.

Not only that but he apologized for making the remark suggesting that even he knew he was in the wrong. How about those facts?

Its the same deal alll through life - go to the wrong place in the wrong or inappropriate clothing and you cannot always expect a good result.

I know. The cop said they shouldn't dress provocatively in general - implying anywhere, not just outside Mongrel Mob HQ.

It was originally about risk mitigation and its been turned into some kind of wierd woman lib thing ffs Its pathetic (and the number attending are pretty sad too)

Risk mitigation, fuck that as well. Not only is it about freedom of speech, choice, expression, but also about disassociating women's sexuality from violence.

Rapists don't care what you're wearing.

[imdying]

Stated facts? He said women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized. That isn't fact, that's opinion.

Yes, that's a fact.

Not only that but he apologized for making the remark suggesting that even he knew he was in the wrong. How about those facts?

He knew he was in the wrong? That's not a fact, that's an opinion. Fact is he knew he was about to get a roasting from feminists who twisted his words and tried to mitigate that.

Risk mitigation, fuck that as well. Not only is it about freedom of speech, choice, expression, but also about disassociating women's sexuality from violence.

This right here is the real problem.

He didn't make his comments about freedom of speed, choice, or expression. He made his comments based on wanting to fulfil one of the males natural desires; to protect females from predators. All he wanted was for less women to be raped.

The fact that you idiotic feminists can't see that is somewhat disturbing. On that basis, they deserve to get raped.

[jaffaonajappa]

It was originally about risk mitigation and its been turned into some kind of wierd woman lib thing ffs Its pathetic (and the number attending are pretty sad too)

But theres the issue. It shouldn't be about 'risk mitigation' - and it is really a womens lib thing.

Common sense says women shouldnt be alone in dark or dangerous places etc - thats been a given. But the rapists dont target just slappers / sluts, do they. They target anything. Grandmothers, anyone.

Personally - ive always appreciated trampy dressed chicks.

[jazfender]

Yes, that's a fact.

Except that it isn't. Women will be raped regardless of what they're wearing. Even (or especially?) cartoon mascot costumes.

He knew he was in the wrong? That's not a fact, that's an opinion. Fact is he knew he was about to get a roasting from feminists who twisted his words and tried to mitigate that.

OK, I'll admit that I don't know the reason he apologised, but normally people do it when they realise they are wrong. Of course there's as much chance he did so to save face, as that's what you do these days, so this is a moot point.

He didn't make his comments about freedom of speed, choice, or expression. He made his comments based on wanting to fulfil one of the males natural desires; to protect females from predators. All he wanted was for less women to be raped.

When a person of authority speaks about a crime in which they are in a position to prevent or protect, one would hope they knew what the fuck they were talking about.

When a group of victims are told that they are partly to blame for the offence, based on...nothing, by said authority figure, they get angry. This is not rocket science.

[jaffaonajappa]

Arghhhhhh.
This dumbarsed message pops up.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to jazfender again.