Hmmm, so http://ktm.co.nz/ is a bit of a shit website then![]()
Hmmm, so http://ktm.co.nz/ is a bit of a shit website then![]()
I ride a CRF450 they aren't to powerful, they are harder on the body. When you twist the gas in any gear or rev range it will go. Done 160 hours no probs
I rode a 300exc and found it had good bottom to mid but really lacked top end probably a great trail riding bike with the + side of less moving parts so less rebuilding cost. Also easier to start then my CRF450
Feed back ive had on the 350F from KTM is it lacks torque so in the slop or sand its going to be slower.
Here we go boris
SXf motocross linkage, no side stand, 19inch rear, close ratio gear box, mx suspension
XCf mx linkage, side stand, larger fuel tank, mx exhaust, mx suspension, wide ratio gear box, no lights.
EXCf PDS no linkage, full lighting & can road reg, side stand, enduro spec suspension & exhaust
The XC models are an american model built up for there cross country races in the desert & prairies eg montana, texas, utah.
At last count KTM make 10 distinct 250cc models, some times it is to much choice.
SX-F - Motocross bike, 5 speed, 19in rear wheel, black standard tank, linkage rear
XC-F - Cross country bike, based on SX-F, 6 speed, 18in rear wheel, clear larger tank, linkage rear
EXC-F - Enduro bike, enduro spec engines, 6 speed, 18 in rear wheel, clear larger tank, no linkage/PDS rear.
Or something close to that anyway.
THE DEAR LEADER SAY'S Life is Hell ride hard or head home just get the fuck outta my way !!!
Yep Barty is right it'll cost you $12.50 to demo ride the bikes, if you bring your own it'll be $25 charge to ride & the demos are free that way you can compare them to your steed. There's a BBQ & drinks to.
It's all to do with the insurance & related costs at the venue.
Iain, I am pretty interested in your original question as well. Unlike most of these fellas, I cant afford to stump up for a nice new 350. I understand the not insignificant advantages of the new tech, but I am just not that serious or well off.
When I got my 450, I was actually looking for a 300, as I like the two stroke thing. Mostly ridden these off road in the past. Distant past. Before power valves etc. So I was very keen to get some new(er) tech in two strokes. I rode a couple briefly, and was pretty excited and awe struck with their awsome performance and potential compared to previous experience. Then I brought the berg (with a grenaded engine) without riding it (but rode a similar one).
I have to say I don't regret getting the 450, but it does not stop me missing some of the two stroke characteristics. I think it largely depends on the type of riding you prefer. For woodhill and the likes, I find the 450 fine, and possibly an advantage I would say. Grunt everywhere, and like you say, it just eats hills. But the disadvantage is weight. I don't feel this when riding, but when the going gets tough and really tight, I really miss the two stroke thing. The 450 is heavy when you have to carry it
The two strokes are really much lighter, and you really notice this when the engines are out of the frame. To my mind this is what makes the biggest difference to the riding experience that you pointed out at the start. I think it just comes down to personal preference and the type of riding you do. But I have not spent a lot of time on a modern two stroke, so maybe just the grass is always greener on the other side......
Would love to hear from somone who has ridden both the bikes you mention in tight stuff particularly. Or maybe I should meet you up at woodhill one weekend, and we swap bikes for a while? Or should we go for the wires![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks