I think talk of when pursuit actually commences is a red herring.
Once the police officer decides to pursue, and commences to turn and follow a car, the pursuit is on from that moment, as the intention to pursue is there.
Splitting hairs about when the pursuit has commenced isn't going to help here.
The problem is the decision to pursue, and in a number of occasions it would appear that the police officers aren't being properly advised on how best to handle this situation.
Deano - its not that they are stalling the car. Anyone who's driven a Holden Commodore can talk about the traction control systems and what they do when you try and U-turn quickly.
The only way to properly do a wheel spinning u-turn in a Holden Commodore is to turn off the traction control. Otherwise it will KILL your drive and look like the car is stalled.
And herein lies a major rub. I'm not sure on Police procedure and I can't comment on whether the Police are allowed to disengage traction control systems. Or it could be that in the heat of the moment (red mist?) the officer simply forgot to disengage the system.
Either way, the heart of the problem here is the decision to pursue. And this is primarily due to the lack of other options Police have at their disposal, forcing the officers to believe that the only thing they can do is chase down the speeder.
Sooner or later a Police car traveling in excess of 200km/h to chase a motorist doing in excess of 150km/hr is going to collide with a family in another car.
And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.
- James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.
Bookmarks