Police killing us again!

[thepom]

I,m with ktm.................

[Scuba_Steve]

Mate you are out to lunch.

It fucking scares me to think I share roads with you.

ANYONE travelling faster than it takes to stop in the amount of visible road ahead is a fucking liability.

To answer your question with a question, what is to say that someone hasn't lost an insecure load just around that corner that you haven't allowed yourself room to stop for? Sorry to burst your little 'I'm psychic' bubble, it's when not if.

If it scares you to share the roads with me I'm surprised you use them at all, I'm one of the best out there NOT the best but definitely up there.

"visible road" is a bullshit argument as visible road is a variable that changes all the time one second you could have 500m the next it could be 10m it only takes 1 second to lose 490m of clear visible road.

As for the insecure load that is the "when" again the "speed" is "if" it still relies on this other factor to matter, and I did qualify "speed" as a to the condition thing, "excessive speed" is "dangerous driving" and that is a "when".

[scumdog]

Well put, only a complete fuck-wit would pull a U-Turn there, "I'll have him" was the quote, 150 kmh (shock horror) is not that fast on a modern bike, the PIG got away with murder, for $250.00. FUCK HIM the slimey arsewipe career hypocrite

Wa-wa-fuckin'-wa...are you sorry lot STILL bangng on about this...

I'm away out to the snow-balls again, I get more sense from them...

[Owl]

it only takes 1 second to lose 490m of clear visible road.

If you're traveling at 1764kph

[blackdog]

If it scares you to share the roads with me I'm surprised you use them at all, I'm one of the best out there NOT the best but definitely up there.

OMG. I'm guessing you are one of these guys that reckons there is no point seeking further rider training because you know it all already.

"visible road" is a bullshit argument as visible road is a variable that changes all the time one second you could have 500m the next it could be 10m it only takes 1 second to lose 490m of clear visible road.

You will find that visibility returns quickly after extracting your head from your arse.

As for the insecure load that is the "when" again the "speed" is "if" it still relies on this other factor to matter, and I did qualify "speed" as a to the condition thing, "excessive speed" is "dangerous driving" and that is a "when".

I see no difference between this and your teleporting girl theory

How are the fairies today?

[HenryDorsetCase]

So at 100kph in 1.5 seconds you've travelled about 30 metres.

That still leaves 90 metres.

40 metres. leaving 80.

I know somewhere I have read a magazine test (Cycle World) with Don Canet on the then-latest crop of supersports trying to beat ABS. fairly recent. I want to try and find it. That 70-75 metres you quoted from 100kph is interesting.

I did an "advanced" riding course a few years ago, and one of the drills was panic braking. So perfect conditions (dry racetrack), accelerate up to say 80 or 90, drop the picks. I locked the front wheel momentarily on one run (lesson: squeeze dont grab: works with boobies too) but we got to some quite surprisingly short stopping distances. but, no tapemeasure, just "crikey, that was shorter then last time".

I'm talking about riding generally now, by the way, not this accident.

[HenryDorsetCase]

If you're traveling at 1764kph

you'd need the afterburners on. and your g-suit. but quite do-able. (in an F-14)

[Kickaha]

If it scares you to share the roads with me I'm surprised you use them at all, I'm one of the best out there NOT the best but definitely up there.

According to who?

"visible road" is a bullshit argument as visible road is a variable that changes all the time one second you could have 500m the next it could be 10m it only takes 1 second to lose 490m of clear visible road.

Can't say I've ever struck a scenario in which I've lost 490m of visibility in 1 second, under what circumstances would that happen?

[bogan]

Can't say I've ever struck a scenario in which I've lost 490m of visibility in 1 second, under what circumstances would that happen?

One gi-fucking-normus bumble bee splatter!

[Scuba_Steve]

How are the fairies today?

Not sure, don't think I've ever met any, maybee chicks in fairy wings but no actual fairies. I'm assuming you have met them?

According to who?

Can't say I've ever struck a scenario in which I've lost 490m of visibility in 1 second, under what circumstances would that happen?

Me and I got no prob proving it neither unlike most.

You probably haven't struck it. 1 circumstance it could happen is if your on a straight 500m till the next car, trees covering the sides, & a car runs a give-way at speed 10m in-front of you your've suddenly lost 490m of clear road in 1 sec admittedly not likely to happen but neither is a PIG doing a 3-point in the most retarded place they could.

[blackdog]

...visible road is a variable that changes all the time one second you could have 500m... the next it could be 10m it only takes 1 second to lose 490m of clear visible road.

...suddenly lost 490m of clear road in 1 sec admittedly not likely to happen but...

Fuck me, you can't even agree with yourself!

[Scuba_Steve]

Mate you are out to lunch.

It fucking scares me to think I share roads with you.

ANYONE travelling faster than it takes to stop in the amount of visible road ahead is a fucking liability.

To answer your question with a question, what is to say that someone hasn't lost an insecure load just around that corner that you haven't allowed yourself room to stop for? Sorry to burst your little 'I'm psychic' bubble, it's when not if.

Fuck me, you can't even agree with yourself!

Do you work for the propaganda machine? (News media) Your pretty good at paraphrasing as to take completely out of context.

Look I can do it too, good to see your starting to come round

[ktm]

Wa-wa-fuckin'-wa...are you sorry lot STILL bangng on about this...

I'm away out to the snow-balls again, I get more sense from them...

Good ole Scum Dog/ Pig Man, troll troll troll, what jolly fun you pigs have ay, no cares and no worries, just U-Turn, U-Turn, (Bridgeman? vs Brent Russel and co.) whoops, another dead/ maimed BIKER, what fun to be above the law....in your twisted mind....this is a biker forum for bikers, go start your own forum , say, Pig Forum for PIGS, you sick pervert, no concern at all for the dead and injured, key board and uniform HERO

[HenryDorsetCase]

Good ole Scum Dog/ Pig Man, troll troll troll, what jolly fun you pigs have ay, no cares and no worries, just U-Turn, U-Turn, (Bridgeman? vs Brent Russel and co.) whoops, another dead/ maimed BIKER, what fun to be above the law....in your twisted mind....this is a biker forum for bikers, go start your own forum , say, Pig Forum for PIGS, you sick pervert, no concern at all for the dead and injured, key board and uniform HERO

Good lord, you're quite insane.

[StoneY]

My PERSONAL opinion sits somewhat between Katman and KTM's viewpoints here

The U-Turn should never have happened

The rider should not have been speeding

Michael Jackson should have had his ass smacked more

Life carries on